Ambient air pollution on the Highveld : an airshed at a watershed moment?

dc.contributor.authorWernecke, Bianca
dc.contributor.authorLangerman, Kristy E.
dc.contributor.authorGarland, Rebecca M.
dc.contributor.authorFeig, Gregor Timothy
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-10T12:51:05Z
dc.date.available2023-05-10T12:51:05Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractOn 18 March 2022, the Pretoria High Court found that chronic air pollution is a violation of Section 24 of the South African Constitution, and that South Africans have a right to an environment that is not harmful to their health and well-being (CER, 2022). This “has important implications for communities forced to live with the debilitating effects of air pollution on the Mpumalanga Highveld, and more broadly for constitutional jurisprudence and government accountability” (CER, 2022). Since 2019, two environmental justice groups, groundWork and the Vukani Environmental Justice Movement, represented by the Centre for Environmental Rights (CER), sought recourse from the High Court on the high air pollution levels in the Highveld Priority Area (HPA). The basis of this “Deadly Air” Case was a declaration that “the poor air quality in the Highveld Priority Area is a breach of the residents’ right to an environment that is not harmful to their health and wellbeing” (CER, 2022). The HPA is known for its poor air quality. Numerous studies have reported widespread non-compliance with the PM and O3, as well as NOx and SO2 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) (Steyn and Kornelius 2018; Feig et al., 2019; Chindhindi et al., 2019; Morosele and Langerman 2020). There are a range of air pollution sources which contribute to the poor air quality in the HPA, including industry, roads, vehicles, mining, power generation, biomass burning, wind-blown dust, domestic fuel use practices and waste burning, to name a few (Ross et al., 2007; Nkosi et al., 2018; Walton et al., 2021). The negative impacts of the air pollution are felt by many who reside on the Highveld and even beyond. Much pressure has been placed on government by civil society and legal experts to improve the air quality in the region, leading to many difficult discussions. Consequently, over the past years, the air quality in the airshed has become the focus of many air pollution-related research studies, legal debates and media releases.en_US
dc.description.departmentGeography, Geoinformatics and Meteorologyen_US
dc.description.librarianam2023en_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.cleanairjournal.org.zaen_US
dc.identifier.citationWernecke, B., Langerman, K.E., GArland, R.M. et al. 2022, 'Ambient air pollution on the Highveld : an airshed at a watershed moment?', Clean Air Journal, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1-3, doi : 10.17159/caj/2022/32/1.14070.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2410-972X
dc.identifier.other10.17159/caj/2022/32/1.14070
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/90621
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherNational Association for Clean Airen_US
dc.rights© 2022. The Author(s). Published under a 1 Creative Commons Attribution Licence.en_US
dc.subjectConstitutionen_US
dc.subjectPretoria High Courten_US
dc.subjectRight to an environmenten_US
dc.subjectHealthen_US
dc.subjectChronic air pollutionen_US
dc.subjectAir pollutionen_US
dc.subjectWell-beingen_US
dc.titleAmbient air pollution on the Highveld : an airshed at a watershed moment?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wernecke_Ambient_2022.pdf
Size:
63.98 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: