Biometric information recognition using artificial intelligence algorithms : a performance comparison

dc.contributor.authorAbdullahi, Sanusi
dc.contributor.authorKhunpanuk, Chainarong
dc.contributor.authorBature, Zakariyya
dc.contributor.authorChiroma, Haruna
dc.contributor.authorPakkaranang, Nuttapol
dc.contributor.authorAbubakar, Auwal Bala
dc.contributor.authorIbrahim, Abdulkarim
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-09T13:05:45Z
dc.date.available2022-12-09T13:05:45Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-02
dc.description.abstractAddressing crime detection, cyber security and multi-modal gaze estimation in biometric information recognition is challenging. Thus, trained artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms such as Support vector machine (SVM) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) have been proposed to recognize distinct and discriminant features of biometric information (intrinsic hand features and demographic cues) with good classification accuracy. Unfortunately, due to nonlinearity in distinct and discriminant features of biometric information, accuracy of SVM and ANFIS is reduced. As a result, optimized AI algorithms ((ANFIS) with subtractive clustering (ANFIS-SC) and SVM with error correction output code (SVM-ECOC)) have shown to be effective for biometric information recognition. In this paper, we compare the performance of the ANFIS-SC and SVM-ECOC algorithms in their effectiveness at learning essential characteristics of intrinsic hand features and demographic cues based on Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) feature selection. Furthermore, the accuracy of these algorithms are presented, and their recognition performances are evaluated by root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), scatter index (SI), mean absolute deviation (MAD), coefficient of determination (R 2 ), Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) and Nash-Sutcliffe model efficiency index (NSE). Evaluation results show that both SVM-ECOC and ANFIS-SC algorithms are suitable for accurately recognizing soft biometric information on basis of intrinsic hand measurements and demographic cues. Moreover, comparison results demonstrated that ANFIS-SC algorithms can provide better recognition accuracy, with RMSE, AICc, MAPE, R 2 and NSE values of ≤ 3.85, 2.39E+02, 0.18%, ≥ 0.99 and ≥ 99, respectively.en_US
dc.description.departmentMathematics and Applied Mathematicsen_US
dc.description.urihttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentIssue.jsp?punumber=6287639en_US
dc.identifier.citationS. B. Abdullahi et al., "Biometric Information Recognition Using Artificial Intelligence Algorithms: A Performance Comparison," in IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 49167-49183, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3171850.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2169-3536 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3171850
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88721
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineersen_US
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.en_US
dc.subjectBiometric features recognitionen_US
dc.subjectDemographic cuesen_US
dc.subjectAdaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS)en_US
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence (AI)en_US
dc.subjectSupport vector machine (SVM)en_US
dc.titleBiometric information recognition using artificial intelligence algorithms : a performance comparisonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Abdullahi_Biometric_2022.pdf
Size:
2.74 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: