A comparative overview of various single-shaft and parallel-flow Brayton cycles developed from turbochargers

dc.contributor.authorCockcroft, C.C.
dc.contributor.authorLe Roux, Willem Gabriel
dc.contributor.emailwillem.leroux@up.ac.za
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-12T08:51:03Z
dc.date.available2025-06-12T08:51:03Z
dc.date.issued2025-07
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY : Data will be made available on request.
dc.description.abstractAutomotive turbochargers can be used to develop gas turbine cycles; however, turbochargers operate at low pressure ratios where cycle performance is sensitive to the addition of pressure-drop components. Parallel-flow Brayton cycles have been proposed to reduce the effect of pressure losses on cycle performance. This analytical study therefore compares various parallel-flow Brayton cycle configurations to their single-shaft counterparts, considering combustion, recuperation, as well as a concentrated solar power input via a solar dish and an open-cavity tubular receiver to identify where parallel-flow cycles are advantageous. Results show that the main shaft turbocharger choice greatly influences whether a single-shaft or a parallel-flow cycle is more beneficial. In recuperated solar cycles with a 6 % combustion chamber pressure loss, the parallel-flow low-temperature-turbine configuration with the solar receiver before the power turbine (in parallel with the main shaft) can achieve a peak thermal efficiency of 23.5 %, with 3 kW of power output, at a pressure ratio of 1.6. This can be compared with a peak thermal efficiency of 21.8 % at a pressure ratio of 1.75 for its single-shaft counterpart. In recuperated parallel-flow cycles and recuperated solar parallel-flow cycles, thermal efficiency performance improves under increased combustion chamber pressure losses, from 6 % up to 11 %, in contrast to the declining performance of single-shaft cycles. More specifically, at a pressure ratio of 1.8, results show that the parallel-flow low-temperature-turbine configuration can outperform its single-shaft counterpart when combustion chamber pressure losses exceed 8.7 %. The study highlights the potential of parallel-flow Brayton cycles for recuperation and concentrated solar power integration, particularly in low-pressure-ratio systems, offering practical guidance for turbocharger and cycle configuration selection. Previous article in issue
dc.description.departmentMechanical and Aeronautical Engineering
dc.description.librarianhj2025
dc.description.sdgSDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.description.sdgSDG-07: Affordable and clean energy
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Department of Science and Innovation (DSI).
dc.description.urihttps://www.elsevier.com/locate/enconman
dc.identifier.citationCockcroft, C.C. & Le Roux, W.G. 2025, 'A comparative overview of various single-shaft and parallel-flow Brayton cycles developed from turbochargers', Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 335, aert. 119837, pp. 1-42, doi : 10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119837.
dc.identifier.issn0196-8904 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1879-2227 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.enconman.2025.119837
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/102782
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.rights© 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).
dc.subjectAutomotive turbochargers
dc.subjectBrayton cycle
dc.subjectTurbocharger
dc.subjectConcentrating solar power
dc.subjectRecuperation
dc.subjectSingle-shaft
dc.subjectParallel-flow
dc.titleA comparative overview of various single-shaft and parallel-flow Brayton cycles developed from turbochargers
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Cockcroft_Comparative_2025.pdf
Size:
20.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: