Documentation of peripheral auditory function in studies of the auditory P300 as biomarker for neurological and psychological disorders : a critical review

dc.contributor.advisorBiagio de Jager, Leigh
dc.contributor.coadvisorMahomed-Asmail, Faheema
dc.contributor.coadvisorHall III, James W
dc.contributor.emailjanushcavdmerwe@gmail.comen_US
dc.contributor.postgraduateVan der Merwe, Janushca
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-03T09:16:22Z
dc.date.available2022-08-03T09:16:22Z
dc.date.created2022-09
dc.date.issued2022
dc.descriptionDissertation (MA (Audiology))--University of Pretoria, 2022.en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The auditory P300 is widely investigated for its clinical application in certain neurological and psychological disorders. However, hearing loss is also known to affect auditory P300 recordings. The inclusion of participants with peripheral hearing impairments in such studies would, therefore, affect the validity of results and conclusions drawn. Objective: A critical review was conducted to examine whether the peripheral hearing status of participants with neurological and psychological disorders was documented in published clinical studies of the auditory P300 response. Design: Literature searches were conducted using three databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, and Scopus. Studies of participants with seven neurological or psychological disorders were included in the study. Each disorder was coupled with the main search phrase in separate searches on each database. Literature review software, DistillerSR, was utilized to aid in data extraction and analysis. Results: Among included studies, the auditory P300 was utilized for three primary reasons: as a biomarker, as a genetic predictor, and as a treatment progress tracker. Of the 102 papers which met the inclusion criteria, the majority (64%) did not describe the peripheral hearing sensitivity of participants. For participants at risk for hearing impairment, particularly age-related hearing loss, only a single publication adequately described formal hearing evaluation. Conclusion: Peripheral hearing status is rarely defined in studies of the P300 response. It is likely that the inclusion of participants with hearing loss affects the validity of findings for these studies. We recommend formal hearing assessment prior to inclusion of participants in studies of the auditory P300 response. The findings of this study may increase the awareness among researchers outside the field of audiology of the effects of peripheral hearing loss on the auditory P300.en_US
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden_US
dc.description.degreeMA (Audiology)en_US
dc.description.departmentSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiologyen_US
dc.identifier.citation*en_US
dc.identifier.otherS2022
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/86673
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2022 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectPeripheral auditory functionen_US
dc.subjectAudiologyen_US
dc.subjectAuditory P300 responseen_US
dc.subjectEvoked potentialsen_US
dc.subjectClinical applicationen_US
dc.subjectNervous system -diseasesen_US
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.titleDocumentation of peripheral auditory function in studies of the auditory P300 as biomarker for neurological and psychological disorders : a critical reviewen_US
dc.typeDissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
van der Merwe_Documentation_2022.pdf
Size:
2.45 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: