Cervical intervertebral disk to vertebral body ratios of different dog breeds based on sagittal magnetic resonance imaging

dc.contributor.authorDuver, Pia
dc.contributor.authorPrecht, Christina
dc.contributor.authorFosgate, Geoffrey Theodore
dc.contributor.authorFirterre, Franck
dc.contributor.authorHettlich, Bianca
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-14T12:22:34Z
dc.date.available2018-11-14T12:22:34Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-05
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE : To establish sagittal area and length reference values and ratios between apparently normal canine cervical vertebrae and intervertebral disks using magnetic resonance imaging. SAMPLE : Retrospective evaluation of cervical vertebral column magnetic resonance imaging studies of 44 dogs representing 5 different breeds (Labrador Retriever, n = 10; French Bulldog, n = 10; Great Dane, n = 9; Chihuahua, n = 10; Dachshund, n = 5). PROCEDURES : Mid-sagittalmeasurements of vertebral body and disk areaswere obtained from C3 through C7 vertebrae and C2/C3 through C6/C7 intervertebral disks. Disk to vertebra area ratios were calculated and compared among dog breeds. Additionally, sagittal vertebral body and disk length measurements were obtained and disk to vertebra length ratios calculated. Inter and intra observer variability was assessed. RESULTS : There were significant differences for disk to vertebral body area and length ratios between evaluated dog breeds and cervical vertebral locations (p < 0.001). Mean area ratio of Chihuahuas was significantly larger than all other breeds, while results from Dachshunds were only significantly different than Chihuahuas and Labrador Retrievers. Mean area ratios were statistically different between the cranial and caudal cervical vertebral locations. Regarding length ratios, results from Chihuahuas were significantly different than all breeds except Dachshunds. Mean length ratios were statistically different between all cervical locations, except C2/C3 compared to C3/C4. Intra- and interobserver variability was very good to excellent. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE : There are significant differences in area and length ratios between dog breeds. Differences also exist in area and length ratios between the cranial and caudal cervical vertebral column. These differences may play a role in the development of vertebral column diseases including intervertebral disk disease.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentProduction Animal Studiesen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2018en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science#en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationDüver P, Precht C, Fosgate G, Forterre F and Hettlich B (2018) Cervical Intervertebral Disk to Vertebral Body Ratios of Different Dog Breeds Based on Sagittal Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Front. Vet. Sci. 5:248. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00248.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2297-1769 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.3389/fvets.2018.00248
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/67261
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_ZA
dc.rights© 2018 Düver, Precht, Fosgate, Forterre and Hettlich. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).en_ZA
dc.subjectCanineen_ZA
dc.subjectCervical vertebral columnen_ZA
dc.subjectMorphometryen_ZA
dc.subjectIntervertebral disken_ZA
dc.subjectMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)en_ZA
dc.subjectAreaen_ZA
dc.subjectLengthen_ZA
dc.subjectRatioen_ZA
dc.titleCervical intervertebral disk to vertebral body ratios of different dog breeds based on sagittal magnetic resonance imagingen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Duver_Cervical_2018.pdf
Size:
740 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: