Forensic dentistry case book 9 : the “bite mark” that caused confusion
Loading...
Date
Authors
Bernitz, Herman
Kloppers, B.A.
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
South African Dental Association
Abstract
A bite mark case was received from the Eastern Cape for
analysis in the Department of Oral Pathology and Oral Biology.
The evidence included a photograph of a bite mark
on the left cheek of the victim, see Figure 1, two silicone
impressions of the bite mark and a set of study models of
the suspect’s dentition. Although the evidence proved to
be sufficient for analysis, the recommended protocol for
the collection of evidence was not followed.1 No American
Board of Forensic Pathology (ABFO) rule or metric scale
was used during the photographic session and the impression
was extremely thin with no backing to maintain
anatomical contours of the area bitten.
Description
Keywords
Bite mark, Victim, Evidence
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Bernitz, H. & Kloppers, B.A. 2017, 'Forensic dentistry case book 9 : the “bite mark” that caused confusion', South African Dental Journal, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 228-229.
