Water and radiation use efficiency of sugarcane for bioethanol production in South Africa, benchmarked against other selected crops

dc.contributor.authorOlivier, Francois C.
dc.contributor.authorSingels, Abraham
dc.contributor.authorEksteen, Alana B.
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-20T09:27:49Z
dc.date.issued2016-01
dc.description.abstractThere are indications that high-fibre sugarcane genotypes may produce more biomass and use resources more efficiently than conventional sugarcane cultivars. The objective of this research was to gather quantitative information on resource use for selected conventional and high-fibre sugarcane genotypes and benchmark it against other bioethanol crops. Although conventional sugarcane initially grew slower than sorghum and Napier grass, it produced very high biomass (about 70 t ha−1) and theoretical ethanol (first- and secondgenerations) yields (about 27 kL ha−1) at 12 months, and used water relatively efficiently (about 5 kg m−3 and 2 kL m−3), out-performing all other crops except sorghum. The contribution of cellulosic ethanol to total ethanol yield varied hugely, from 89% for the high-fibre sugarcane hybrid to about 48% for conventional sugarcane, to as low as 14% for sugar beet. The high-fibre sugarcane hybrid grew faster initially and produced more biomass at eight months (56 t ha−1 vs 45 t ha−1) than the conventional types, but then flowered, reducing its growth rates markedly thereafter. It was also less sensitive to mild drought conditions. The results suggest that cellulosic ethanol production may be a feasible option that could be incorporated into conventional or biomass sugarcane production systems.en_ZA
dc.description.embargo2017-01-30
dc.description.librarianhb2015en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipSouth African Sugarcane Research Institute.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tjps20en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationFrancois C Olivier, Abraham Singels & Alana B Eksteen (2016) Water and radiation use efficiency of sugarcane for bioethanol production in South Africa, benchmarked against other selected crops, South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 33:1, 1-11, DOI: 10.1080/02571862.2015.1075231.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0257-1862 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2167-034X (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/02571862.2015.1075231
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/50543
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_ZA
dc.rights© Southern African Plant and Soil Sciences Committee and co-published by Taylor & Francis and NISC (Pty) Ltd. This is an electronic version of an article published in South African Journal of Plant and Soil, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1-11, 2016. doi : 1080/02571862.2015.1075231. South African Journal of Plant and Soil is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.comloi/reso2010.en_ZA
dc.subjectBioethanol cropsen_ZA
dc.subjectBiomassen_ZA
dc.subjectHigh-fibre sugarcaneen_ZA
dc.subjectStalk fibre compositionen_ZA
dc.subjectTheoretical ethanol yielden_ZA
dc.titleWater and radiation use efficiency of sugarcane for bioethanol production in South Africa, benchmarked against other selected cropsen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Olivier_Water_2016.pdf
Size:
642.11 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: