Referral criteria for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings : a comparison of protocols

dc.contributor.authorEksteen, Susan
dc.contributor.authorEikelboom, Robert H.
dc.contributor.authorLauner, Stefan
dc.contributor.authorKuper, Hannah
dc.contributor.authorSwanepoel, De Wet
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-17T04:55:22Z
dc.date.available2022-05-17T04:55:22Z
dc.date.issued2021-07
dc.description.abstractPURPOSE : This study aimed to describe and compare the performance of two screening protocols used for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings. METHOD : Secondary data analysis was done to determine the performance of two protocols implemented during a preschool hearing screening program using mobile health technology in South Africa. Pure-tone audiometry screening at 25 dB HL for 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz in each ear was used by both protocols. The fail criterion for the first protocol (2,147 children screened) constituted a no-response on one or more frequencies in either ear. The second protocol required two or more no-responses (5,782 children). Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate associations between outcomes and protocol, age, gender, and duration. RESULTS : Fail rates for the one-frequency fail protocol was 8.7% (n = 186) and 4.3% (n = 250) for the two-frequency fail protocol. Children screened with the two-frequency fail protocol were 52.9% less likely to fail (p < .001; OR = 0.471; 95% confidence interval [0.385, 0.575]). Gender (p = .251) and age (p = .570) had no significant effect on screening outcome. A percentage of cases screened (44.7%) exceeded permissible noise levels in at least one ear at 1000 Hz across both protocols. True- and false-positive cases did not differ significantly between protocols. Protocol type (p = .204), gender (p = .314), and age (p = .982) did not affect the odds of being a true-positive result. Average screening time was 72.8 s (78.66 SD) and 64.9 s (55.78 SD) for the onefrequency and two-frequency fail protocols, respectively. CONCLUSIONS : A two-frequency fail criterion and immediate rescreen of failed frequencies significantly reduced referral rate for follow-up services that are often overburdened in resourced-constrained settings. Future protocol adaptations can also consider increasing the screening levels at 1000 Hz to minimize the influence of environmental noise.en_US
dc.description.departmentSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiologyen_US
dc.description.librarianam2022en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipSonova AG, the Newton Advanced Fellowship Award, the Carel du Toit Centre and Trust and the Hear the World Foundation.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://pubs.asha.org/journal/lshssen_US
dc.identifier.citationEksteen, S., Eikelboom, R.H., Launer, S. et al. 2021, 'Referral criteria for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings : a comparison of protocols', Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, vol. 52 , pp. 868-876.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0161-1461 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1558-9129 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1044/2021_LSHSS-21-00008
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/85223
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Speech-Language-Hearing Associationen_US
dc.rights© 2021 The Authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_US
dc.subjectScreening protocolsen_US
dc.subjectPreschool hearing screeningen_US
dc.subjectChildrenen_US
dc.subjectEaren_US
dc.titleReferral criteria for preschool hearing screening in resource-constrained settings : a comparison of protocolsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Eksteen_Referral_2021.pdf
Size:
224.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: