Vonnisbespreking : Nog ’n vriendskaplike-sekwestrasie-aansoek sneuwel : Botha v Botha [2017] JOL 38011 (VB)

dc.contributor.authorRoestoff, Melanie
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T11:52:36Z
dc.date.available2019-09-30T11:52:36Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractBotha is one of many friendly sequestration applications that was dismissed because the applicant failed to prove that it would be to the advantage of creditors to sequestrate the respondent-debtor’s estate. Daffue J suggested that Botha was a typical case where the debtor should rather have pursued his rights regarding debt review under the National Credit Act (NCA) 34 of 2005 in order to find a way out of his financial dilemma. However, unlike the position regarding rehabilitation after sequestration under the Insolvency Act 24 of 1936, debt review does not provide for any discharge of debt, since the NCA’s objective of providing debt relief is subject to the principle of satisfaction by the debtor of all financial obligations. The aim of this case note is to analyse and evaluate the facts and decision in Botha in light of international trends and guidelines that all ―honest but unfortunate debtors‖ who land in a hopeless financial situation due to factors beyond their control, should be provided relief in the form of a discharge. The legal implication of the decision, namely that the current South African system provides discharge relief only to debtors who have sufficient assets to prove advantage, is important. Therefore, recent law reform proposals that provision be made for a procedure of debt intervention as well as the proposals for a pre-liquidation composition are also discussed. However, it is argued that the proposed procedures would not have provided a viable solution to the debtor’s financial predicament in Botha. The conclusion is that the shortcomings of the system should be addressed in a holistic and comprehensive manner. Unnecessary restrictions on access to debt relief and the overlap between the various procedures should be eliminated. Ultimately it is imperative that all debtors, from both the lower income and middle income groups, should be offered equal protection and relief by means of a discharge from debt.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentMercantile Lawen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2019en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.litnet.co.za/category/akademies/litnet-akademiesen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationRoestoff, M. 2018, 'Vonnisbespreking : Nog ’n vriendskaplike-sekwestrasie-aansoek sneuwel : Botha v Botha [2017] JOL 38011 (VB)', LitNet Akademies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1258-1280.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1995-5928
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/71499
dc.language.isoAfrikaansen_ZA
dc.publisherLitNeten_ZA
dc.rightsLitNeten_ZA
dc.subjectAbuse of processen_ZA
dc.subjectAccess to debt reliefen_ZA
dc.subjectAdministrationen_ZA
dc.subjectAdvantage of creditorsen_ZA
dc.subjectConsumer insolvencyen_ZA
dc.subjectCreditoren_ZA
dc.subjectDebt interventionen_ZA
dc.subjectDebtoren_ZA
dc.subjectDebt reliefen_ZA
dc.subjectDebt restructuringen_ZA
dc.subjectDebt reviewen_ZA
dc.subjectDischarge of debten_ZA
dc.subjectExtinguishen_ZA
dc.subjectFresh starten_ZA
dc.subjectFriendly sequestrationen_ZA
dc.subjectIncome restructuringen_ZA
dc.subjectInsolvency Acten_ZA
dc.subjectInternational guidelinesen_ZA
dc.subjectInternational trendsen_ZA
dc.subjectLaw reform proposalsen_ZA
dc.subjectNational Credit Amendment Billen_ZA
dc.subjectNational Credit Act 34 of 2005 (NCA)en_ZA
dc.subjectNINA debtorsen_ZA
dc.subjectNo income no asset debtorsen_ZA
dc.subjectPre-liquidation compositionen_ZA
dc.subjectRehabilitationen_ZA
dc.subjectSequestrationen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth African Law Reform Commission (SALRC)en_ZA
dc.subjectSuspensionen_ZA
dc.subjectVoluntary surrenderen_ZA
dc.subjectWorld Banken_ZA
dc.subjectAdministrasieen_ZA
dc.subjectFresh starten_ZA
dc.subjectInkomsteherstruktureringen_ZA
dc.subjectInsolvensieen_ZA
dc.subjectInsolvensieweten_ZA
dc.subjectInternasionale riglyneen_ZA
dc.subjectInternasionale tendenseen_ZA
dc.subjectMisbruik van prosesen_ZA
dc.subjectNasionale Kredietweten_ZA
dc.subjectNational Credit Amendment Billen_ZA
dc.subjectNINA-skuldenaarsen_ZA
dc.subjectNo income no asset-skuldenaarsen_ZA
dc.subjectOpskortingen_ZA
dc.subjectRegshervormingsvoorstellen_ZA
dc.subjectRehabilitasieen_ZA
dc.subjectSekwestrasieen_ZA
dc.subjectSkuldeiseren_ZA
dc.subjectSkuldenaaren_ZA
dc.subjectSkuldhersieningen_ZA
dc.subjectSkuldherstruktureringen_ZA
dc.subjectSkuldintervensieen_ZA
dc.subjectSkuldkwytskeldingen_ZA
dc.subjectSkuldverligtingen_ZA
dc.subjectSuid-Afrikaanse Regshervormingskommissie (SARK)en_ZA
dc.subjectToegang tot skuldverligtingen_ZA
dc.subjectUitwissingen_ZA
dc.subjectVars beginen_ZA
dc.subjectVerbruikersinsolvensieen_ZA
dc.subjectVoorlikwidasie-akkoorden_ZA
dc.subjectVoordeel vir skuldeisersen_ZA
dc.subjectVriendskaplike sekwestrasieen_ZA
dc.subjectVrywillige boedeloorgaween_ZA
dc.subjectWereldbanken_ZA
dc.titleVonnisbespreking : Nog ’n vriendskaplike-sekwestrasie-aansoek sneuwel : Botha v Botha [2017] JOL 38011 (VB)en_ZA
dc.title.alternativeAnother friendly sequestration application bites the dusten_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Roestoff_Vonnisbespreking_2018.pdf
Size:
749.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: