Hospital and community isolates of uropathogens at a tertiary hospital in South Africa

dc.contributor.authorHabte, T.M.
dc.contributor.authorDube, S.
dc.contributor.authorIsmail, Nazir Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorHoosen, Anwar Ahmed
dc.date.accessioned2009-09-23T09:58:48Z
dc.date.available2009-09-23T09:58:48Z
dc.date.issued2009-08
dc.description.abstractAIM: To investigate the profile of common uropathogens isolated from urine specimens submitted to the diagnostic microbiology laboratory at a tertiary teaching hospital and assess their antimicrobial susceptibility patterns to commonly used antimicrobial agents. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of laboratory reports for all urine specimens submitted for investigations over a 1-year period. Isolates were tested by means of the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method for susceptibility to amoxicillin, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, co-trimoxazole and nitrofurantoin, and for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) production. RESULTS: Out of the total specimens (N =2 203) received over the 1-year study period, 51.1% (1 126) of the urine samples were culture-positive, the majority (65.4%) having come from females. The most common isolate was Escherichia coli (39.0%) followed by Klebsiella species (20.8%) and Enterococcus faecalis (8.2%). The Gram-negative isolates displayed a very high level of resistance to amoxicillin (range 43 - 100%) and co-trimoxazole (range 29 - 90%), whereas resistance to gentamicin (range 0 - 50%) and ciprofloxacin (range 0 - 33%) was lower. E. coli isolates were susceptible to nitrofurantoin (94%), and ESBL production was significantly higher (p=0.01) in the hospital isolates, compared with those from the community referral sites. CONCLUSIONS: The culture-positive rate for uropathogens was high, with a greater incidence among females. E. coli was the most common aetiological agent identified, and remained susceptible to nitrofurantoin. Resistance levels to amoxicillin and co-trimoxazole were very high for all Gram-negative isolates, and it is recommended that these antibiotics should not be used for the empiric treatment of urinary tract infections.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHabte, TM, Dube, S, Ismail, N & Hoosen, AA 2009, 'Hospital and community isolates of uropathogens at a tertiary hospital in South Africa', South African Medical Journal, vol. 99, no. 8, pp. 584-587. [www.samj.org.za]en_US
dc.identifier.issn0038-3469
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/11360
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherHealth and Medical Publishing Groupen_US
dc.rightsHealth and Medical Publishing Groupen_US
dc.subjectUropathogensen
dc.subject.lcshUrine -- Analysisen
dc.subject.lcshPathogenic microorganisms -- Identificationen
dc.subject.lcshAnti-infective agents -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshHospitals -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshDiagnostic microbiology -- South Africaen
dc.titleHospital and community isolates of uropathogens at a tertiary hospital in South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Habte_Hospital(2009).pdf
Size:
473.78 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: