Environmental dynamism as a moderator of the relationship between complexity leadership and contextual ambidexterity

dc.contributor.advisorScheepers, Caren
dc.contributor.emailichelp@gibs.co.za
dc.contributor.postgraduateLombard, Marli
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-11T09:02:44Z
dc.date.available2018-05-11T09:02:44Z
dc.date.created30-03-18
dc.date.issued2017
dc.descriptionMini Dissertation (MBA)--University of Pretoria, 2017.
dc.description.abstractOrganisations need to implement both incremental innovation (exploitation), and radical innovation (exploration) to ensure success and survival. Exploitation improves the efficiency of current operations, whereas exploration develops new entrepreneurial ideas for future viability. Two emerging concepts in literature, complexity leadership and contextual ambidexterity, aim to enable simultaneous exploitation and exploration. Regardless of the similar objectives, available literature has not yet established an association between the concepts. Consequently, the first objective of this research investigated whether complexity leadership could promote an organisationÕs ability to enable both exploitative and exploratory innovation, simultaneously (contextual ambidexterity). Additionally, both complexity leadership and contextual ambidexterity acknowledge the importance of the context within which organisations operate, and the accelerated rate of change in todayÕs organisational environments (environmental dynamism). The rate of change would influence the effectiveness of leadershipÕs innovation efforts. Accordingly, the second objective of this research hypothesised that environmental dynamism would moderate the relationship between these constructs. A sample of 1 204 secondary survey responses was statistically analysed. The researcher confirmed that complexity leadership has a significant, positive, linear relationship with exploitation, exploration, and the combined construct contextual ambidexterity. However, the moderator effect of environmental dynamism on these relationships, was found not to be significant. Therefore, complexity leadership promotes both exploitation and exploration, as well as contextual ambidexterity. This particular leadership approach creates the supportive context that promotes both types of innovation, simultaneously. Leadership can promote contextual ambidexterity through activities associated with this approach, including patterning of attention, developing networks, and contextual intelligence.
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricted
dc.description.degreeMBA
dc.description.departmentGordon Institute of Business Science (GIBS)
dc.description.librarianza2018
dc.identifier.citationLombard, M 2017, Environmental dynamism as a moderator of the relationship between complexity leadership and contextual ambidexterity, MBA Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/64866>
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/64866
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2018 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.titleEnvironmental dynamism as a moderator of the relationship between complexity leadership and contextual ambidexterity
dc.typeMini Dissertation

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Lombard_Environmental_2017.pdf
Size:
8.85 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Mini Dissertation