Circular external fixation and cemented PMMA spacers for the treatment of complex tibial fractures and infected nonunions with segmental bone loss
Loading...
Date
Authors
Van Niekerk, Andries H.
Birkholtz, Franz Friedrich
De Lange, Phillip
Tetsworth, Kevin
Hohmann, Erik
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sage
Abstract
PURPOSE : The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of combined circular external fixation and cemented
polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacer application between a cohort of patients with grade 3 open fractures and infected
tibial nonunions and concomitant segmental bone loss. METHODS : The study was designed as a retrospective cohort
study. All patients who were treated for complex tibial fractures or infected nonunions with segmental bone loss between
2009 and 2013 were included if they were aged between 16 years and 60 years, sustained acute traumatic grade 3 open
tibial fractures, presented with infected nonunion, and were followed up for a minimum of 12 months. Patients with a
history of ipsilateral tibial fractures, contralateral lower extremity fractures, polytrauma, chest, or abdominal trauma and
patients with head injuries were excluded. Both groups were treated with aggressive debridement, circular external
fixation, and antibiotic-impregnated PMMA spacer. Outcome measures were the time in the external fixator (EFT) and the
external fixation index (EFI). RESULTS : Twenty-four patients with a mean age of 32 + 14.7 years were included. Twelve
patients with a mean age of 32 þ 14 years and a mean bone defect of 82 þ 36 mm were treated for acute complex grade 3
open tibial fractures, and 12 patients with a mean age of 35.1 þ 15.7 years and a mean bone defect of 50 þ 26 mm were
treated for infected nonunions. There was no significant difference (p ¼ 0.44) between the groups for EFT (249 + 99
days—tibial fractures; 255 + 142 days—infected nonunion). There were significant between group differences (p ¼
0.027) for EFI (37.3+ 9.1 cm/days—tibial fractures; 56+ 14.5 cm/days—infected nonunion). CONCLUSION : The findings
of this study suggest that patients were treated for infected nonunion with segmental bone loss using circular external
fixation, distraction osteogenesis, and antibiotic-impregnated PMMA spacers, and the spacers may not offer any advantage
over a conventional approach using the principles of osteogenesis only. In contrast, antibiotic-impregnated spacers for
open tibial trauma were advantageous and reduced the EFI considerably.
Description
Keywords
Bone transport, Distraction osteogenesis, Induced membrane, Limb reconstruction, Masquelet technique, PMMA Spacer, Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), External fixator (EFT), External fixation index (EFI)
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Van Niekerk, A.H., Birkholtz, F.F., De Lange, P., Tetsworth, K. & Hohmann, E. 2017, 'Circular external fixation and cemented PMMA spacers for the treatment of complex tibial fractures and infected nonunions with segmental bone loss', Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 1-8.