Combating drunken driving : questioning the validity of blood alcohol concentration analysis

dc.contributor.authorEhmke-Engelbrecht, Ursula
dc.contributor.authorDu Toit-Prinsloo, Lorraine
dc.contributor.authorDeysel, Christelle
dc.contributor.authorJordaan, J.C. (Joyce)
dc.contributor.authorSaayman, Gert
dc.contributor.emaillorraine.dutoit@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-18T12:27:13Z
dc.date.available2016-10-18T12:27:13Z
dc.date.issued2016-09
dc.description.abstractThe reliability and accuracy of blood alcohol concentration results presented in South African courts in respect of possible driving under the influence (DUI) cases, have in recent years been subjected to intense scrutiny and severe criticism. Research has shown that multiple factors may negatively affect the reliability of results obtained from the analysis of such samples – including inappropriate or nonstandardised sample management. In particular, long delays between sample acquisition and analysis may compromise the validity of results. Such delays may also negatively affect the outcome of both criminal and civil legal proceedings in possible DUI cases. A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on records from the Pretoria Forensic Chemistry Laboratory (PFCL) regarding the relevant dates pertaining to blood samples from deceased persons that were received for analysis. The parameters included the dates of sample acquisition at medico-legal mortuaries, delays in submission of samples to the laboratory, and dates of actual analyses. In addition, the expiration dates of sample collection kits were recorded. Our results show that numerous expired kits were utilised and that there was an average delay of approximately five months between sample acquisition and laboratory analysis. This delay period varied greatly but appears to correlate with geographical distances of medico-legal mortuaries from the PFCL. In order to optimise and facilitate the administration of justice in both criminal and civil cases of alleged DUI, these shortcomings should be urgently addressed. It is argued that the implementation of prescribed measures and standard operating procedures in sample management, together with interventions such as accreditation of laboratories and improved resourcing of medico-legal and toxicology laboratories, is urgently required.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentForensic Medicineen_ZA
dc.description.departmentStatisticsen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2016en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication/iscrimeen_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.issafrica.org/publications/south-african-crime-quarterlyen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationEhmke-Engelbrecht, U,Du Toit-Prinsloo, L, Deysel, C Jordaan, J & Saayman, G 2016, 'Questioning the validity of blood alcohol concentration analysis : combating drunken driving', SA Crime Quarterly, no. 57, pp. 7-14.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1991-3877
dc.identifier.other10.17159/2413-3108/2016/v0n57a442
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/57352
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherInstitute for Security Studiesen_ZA
dc.rights© 2016, Institute for Security Studiesen_ZA
dc.subjectBlood alcohol concentration resultsen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth African courtsen_ZA
dc.subjectPretoria Forensic Chemistry Laboratory (PFCL)en_ZA
dc.subjectBlood samplesen_ZA
dc.titleCombating drunken driving : questioning the validity of blood alcohol concentration analysisen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
EhmkeEngelbrecht_Combating_2016.pdf
Size:
85.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: