Neerslag van die metafoor : 'n voorlopige besinning

dc.contributor.authorVos, C.J.A. (Casparus Johannes Adam), 1945-
dc.date.accessioned2007-12-14T04:48:54Z
dc.date.available2007-12-14T04:48:54Z
dc.date.issued2007-09
dc.description.abstractThis article examines the theoretical basis and the hermeneutical processes which determine the appropriation of the metaphor in religious discourse. Throughout the twentieth century the influence of linguistic philosophy on language has been noted by various philosophers, linguists and theologians. Religious language of the twenty first century is furthermore intensely aware of the fact that linguistic utterances pertaining to God have no realistic external referent. This realisation foregrounds the importance of the metaphor and speaking about God by means of metaphorical language. Metaphors are sparks of imagination, transferring a word from its normal context to an estranged one. Meaning crystallises in the course of a dynamic interaction between two concepts that belong supposedly to unrelated, even hostile domains. Often the meaning of metaphors is uncertain because authors are not explicit about their thoughts. This is especially the case with regards to metaphors in the Bible, because the interpretation of metaphors is influenced by the reader's associative frame of reference. Both authors and readers from Biblical times had a context and a frame of reference vastly different from today. However, the meaning of metaphors is not fixed, on the contrary, numerous new meanings may be mobilised by different readers' associative frame of reference. Because metaphors have a history of human experience, these are living metaphors that make language new and exceed the limits of meaning and association. If conventional metaphors permeate all of human life, thought and action, theological discourse is metaphor par excellence. This article concludes with a challenge to Practical Theology, especially Homiletics, Liturgy and Narrative Pastoral Counselling to treat the metaphor with caution and with awe. A dynamic and interactive relationship between theory and praxis is necessary for the metaphor to function creatively and to induce change. Therefore theory needs to find its home in praxis.en
dc.format.extent94211 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationVos, CJA 2007, 'Die neerslag van die metafoor : 'n voorlopige besinning', Dutch Reformed Theological Journal / Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif, vol. 48, no. 3 & 4, pp. 720-729. [http://www.journals.co.za/ej/ejour_ngtt.html]en
dc.identifier.issn0028-2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/4103
dc.language.isoAfrikaansen
dc.publisherTeologiese Fakulteit, Universiteit van Stellenboschen
dc.rightsTeologiese Fakulteit, Universiteit van Stellenboschen
dc.subjectMetafoorafr
dc.subjectNon-kognitiwismeafr
dc.subjectMitologiese sprekeafr
dc.subjectLinguistiese filosofieafr
dc.subjectNon cognitivismen
dc.subjectMithological aphorism / sayingen
dc.subject.lcshMetaphor in the Bibleen
dc.subject.lcshAphorisms and apothegmsen
dc.subject.lcshMyth in the Bibleen
dc.subject.lcshLinguistics -- Philosophyen
dc.titleNeerslag van die metafoor : 'n voorlopige besinningen
dc.title.alternativeThe underlying principles of the metaphor : a preliminary reflectionen
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Vos_Neerslag(2007).pdf
Size:
92 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.4 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: