Assessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on assistive technology for persons with visual impairments : a systematic review

dc.contributor.authorOrtiz-Escobar, Luisa Maria
dc.contributor.authorChavarria, Mario Andres
dc.contributor.authorSchonenberger, Klaus
dc.contributor.authorHurst, Samia
dc.contributor.authorStein, Michael
dc.contributor.authorMugeere, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorVelarde, Minerva Rivas
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T11:47:11Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T11:47:11Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-06
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.en_US
dc.description.abstractDespite scientific and technological advances in the field of assistive technology (AT) for peoplewith visual impairment (VI), technological designs are frequently based on a poor understanding of the physical and social context of use, resulting in devices that are less than optimal for their intended beneficiaries. To resolve this situation, user-centred approaches in the development process of AT have been widely adopted in recent years. However, there is a lack of systematization on the application of this approach. This systematic review registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022307466), assesses the application of the ISO 9241-210 human-centred design principles in allegedly “user-centred designed” AT developments for persons with VI (see Supplementary PROSPERO Protocol). The results point to a wide variation of the depth of understanding of user needs, a poor characterization of the application of the User Centred Design (UCD) approach in the initial design phases or in the early prototyping, and a vague description of user feedback and device iteration. Among the principles set out in ISO 9241-210, the application of 5.6: “the design team includes multidisciplinary skills and perspectives” is the one for which the least evidence is found. The results show there is not enough evidence to fully assess the impact of UCD in (1) promoting innovation regarding AT products and practices, and (2) Judging if AT produced following such standards is leading to better user access, wellbeing outcomes and satisfaction. To address this gap it is necessary to, first, generate better implementation of UCD in AT development and second, to strengthen evidence regarding the implementation and outcomes of using UCD for AT. To better engage with the realities of persons with VI, we propose capacity building across development teams regarding UCD, its principles and components; better planning for UCD implementation; and cross-fertilization across engineering disciplines and social and clinical science.en_US
dc.description.departmentCentre for Human Rightsen_US
dc.description.librarianam2024en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Ambizione grant funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Fondation Gelbert .en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/journals/rehabilitation-sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.citationOrtiz-Escobar, L.M., Chavarria, M.A., Schönenberger, K., Hurst, S., Stein, M.A., Mugeere, A. & Rivas Velarde, M. (2023) Assessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on assistive technology for persons with visual impairments: a systematic review. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 4:1238158. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1238158.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2673-6861 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.3389/fresc.2023.1238158
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/96645
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherFrontiers Mediaen_US
dc.rights© 2023 Ortiz-Escobar, Chavarria, Schönenberger, Hurst, Stein, Mugeere and Rivas Velarde. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).en_US
dc.subjectVisual disabilityen_US
dc.subjectVisually impaireden_US
dc.subjectAssistive technology (AT)en_US
dc.subjectUser–centered designen_US
dc.subjectHuman centred designen_US
dc.subjectInnovationen_US
dc.subjectTechnology designen_US
dc.subjectLow- and middle-income countries (LMICs)en_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.titleAssessing the implementation of user-centred design standards on assistive technology for persons with visual impairments : a systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 3 of 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
OrtizEscobar_Assessing_2023.pdf
Size:
8.29 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
OrtizEscobar_AssessingDataSheetS1_2023.pdf
Size:
184.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
DataSheet S1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
OrtizEscobar_AssessingDataSheetS2_2023.pdf
Size:
71.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
DataSheet S2

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: