Optimising vegetation assessments to facilitate wildlife management

dc.contributor.advisorSomers, Michael J.en
dc.contributor.emailmzingel@icon.co.zaen
dc.contributor.postgraduateZingel, Michael Williamen
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-01T10:33:57Z
dc.date.available2016-07-01T10:33:57Z
dc.date.created2016-04-15en
dc.date.issued2015en
dc.descriptionDissertation (MSc)--University of Pretoria, 2015.en
dc.description.abstractVegetation assessment is a requirement for the identification and understanding of components of complex ecosystems that characterise wildlife areas. It is important that assessment methods are reliable yet practical for use in wildlife management. There are many assessment methods in use. This study sets out to compare two methods that fulfil these requirements and to examine synergy to optimise assessment. The study area is Evelyn Game Ranch situated on the farms Kranenberg 162 MS and Evelyn 159 MS in the Messina magisterial district, Limpopo province, South Africa. It covers 1 293 ha. The owner of Evelyn Game Ranch suggests that overgrazing by livestock in years gone by caused degradation of the veld. The intention is to remedy degradation of the different vegetation communities that comprise the veld. Difficulty exists in delineating the different vegetation communities into manageable entities and relating those with shared floristic attributes to one another. The aim of this study is to show that a map derived from digital Google Earth imagery and classification described by PHYTOSET procedures is less complicated, more objective and less time consuming to develop than the widely used method of physiognomic mapping and vegetation analysis using Braun-Blanquet procedures. Both approaches yielded outcomes usable for modelling for ranch management. However neither was sufficiently superior to allow disregard for the other. I suggest that synergy of the two approaches is a solution, with complementary elements of each applied to a project. Better options are likely to emerge and may develop in a way that would obviate the need for synergies and would suffice on their own. Two methods are suggested. As is the case with PHYTOSET procedures, iterative data and objective classifications characterise these approaches.en
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden
dc.description.degreeMScen
dc.description.departmentAnimal and Wildlife Sciencesen
dc.identifier.citationZingel, MW 2016, Optimising vegetation assessments to facilitate wildlife management, MSc Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/53567>en
dc.identifier.otherA2016en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/53567
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoriaen_ZA
dc.rights© 2016, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.en
dc.subjectUCTDen
dc.subjectVegetation assessment
dc.subjectWildlife management
dc.subjectEcosytems
dc.subjectGame farming
dc.subjectSouth Africa
dc.subject.otherNatural and agricultural sciences theses SDG-12
dc.subject.otherSDG-15: Life on land
dc.titleOptimising vegetation assessments to facilitate wildlife managementen
dc.typeDissertationen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Zingel_Optimising_2015.pdf
Size:
5.7 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Dissertation