Revisiting a flux recovery systematic error arising from common deconvolution methods used in aperture-synthesis imaging

dc.contributor.authorRadcliffe, Jack Frederick
dc.contributor.authorBeswick, R.J.
dc.contributor.authorThomson, A.P.
dc.contributor.authorNjeri, Ann
dc.contributor.authorMuxlow, T.W.B.
dc.contributor.emailjack.radcliffe@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-05T10:57:46Z
dc.date.available2023-12-05T10:57:46Z
dc.date.issued2024-01
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY : The data underlying this article will be shared upon reasonable request to the corresponding author.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe point-spread function (PSF) is a fundamental property of any astronomical instrument. In interferometers, differing array configurations combined with their uv coverage, and various weighting schemes can produce an irregular but deterministic PSF. As a result, the PSF is often deconvolved using CLEAN-style algorithms to improve image fidelity. In this paper, we revisit a significant effect that causes the flux densities measured with any interferometer to be systematically offset from the true values. Using a suite of carefully controlled simulations, we show that the systematic offset originates from a mismatch in the units of the image produced by these CLEAN-style algorithms. We illustrate that this systematic error can be significant, ranging from a few to tens of per cent. Accounting for this effect is important for current and future interferometric arrays, such as MeerKAT, LOFAR, and the SKA, whose core-dominated configuration naturally causes an irregular PSF. We show that this offset is independent of other systematics, and can worsen due to some factors such as the goodness of the fit to the PSF, the deconvolution depth, and the signal-to-noise ratio of the source. Finally, we present several methods that can reduce this effect to just a few per cent.en_US
dc.description.departmentPhysicsen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2023en_US
dc.description.sdgNoneen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, which is funded by the STFC; the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme; the RADIOBLOCKS project will receive funding from the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme; the Development in Africa with Radio Astronomy (DARA) project funded by STFC. 𝑒-MERLIN.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://academic.oup.com/mnrasen_US
dc.identifier.citationRadcliffe, J.F., Beswick, R.J., Thomson, A.P. et al. 2024, 'Revisiting a flux recovery systematic error arising from common deconvolution methods used in aperture-synthesis imaging', Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 527, no. 1, pp. 942-949, doi : 10.1093/mnras/stad2694.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0035-8711 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1365-2966 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1093/mnras/stad2694
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/93749
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen_US
dc.rights© 2023 The Author(s). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Royal Astronomical Society.en_US
dc.subjectPoint-spread function (PSF)en_US
dc.subjectData analysisen_US
dc.subjectTechniquesen_US
dc.subjectInterferometric, photometric – methodsen_US
dc.titleRevisiting a flux recovery systematic error arising from common deconvolution methods used in aperture-synthesis imagingen_US
dc.typePostprint Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Radcliffe_Revisiting_2024.pdf
Size:
687.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: