A systematic review to compare adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes and gestational diabetes

dc.contributor.authorMalaza, Nompumelelo
dc.contributor.authorMasete, Matladi
dc.contributor.authorAdam, Sumaiya
dc.contributor.authorDias, Stephanie
dc.contributor.authorNyawo, Thembeka
dc.contributor.authorPheiffer, Carmen
dc.contributor.emailcarmenen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-12-12T05:31:10Z
dc.date.available2022-12-12T05:31:10Z
dc.date.issued2022-08-31
dc.descriptionSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS : Table S1: PRISMA guidelines, Table S2: Studies correlating types of diabetes in pregnancy and adverse outcomes, Table S3: Newcastle– Ottawa Scale, Table S4: Risk of bias scores.en_US
dc.description.abstractPregestational type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are associated with increased rates of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Adverse outcomes are more common in women with pregestational diabetes compared to GDM; although, conflicting results have been reported. This systematic review aims to summarise and synthesise studies that have compared adverse pregnancy outcomes in pregnancies complicated by pregestational diabetes and GDM. Three databases, Pubmed, EBSCOhost and Scopus were searched to identify studies that compared adverse outcomes in pregnancies complicated by pregestational T1DM and T2DM, and GDM. A total of 20 studies met the inclusion criteria and are included in this systematic review. Thirteen pregnancy outcomes including caesarean section, preterm birth, congenital anomalies, pre-eclampsia, neonatal hypoglycaemia, macrosomia, neonatal intensive care unit admission, stillbirth, Apgar score, large for gestational age, induction of labour, respiratory distress syndrome and miscarriages were compared. Findings from this review confirm that pregestational diabetes is associated with more frequent pregnancy complications than GDM. Taken together, this review highlights the risks posed by all types of maternal diabetes and the need to improve care and educate women on the importance of maintaining optimal glycaemic control to mitigate these risks.en_US
dc.description.departmentObstetrics and Gynaecologyen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Research Foundation.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerphen_US
dc.identifier.citationMalaza, N.; Masete, M.; Adam, S.; Dias, S.; Nyawo, T.; Pheiffer, C. A Systematic Review to Compare Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Pregestational Diabetes and Gestational Diabetes. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 2022, 19, 10846. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710846.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1660-4601 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.3390/ijerph191710846
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/88728
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMDPIen_US
dc.rights© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectType 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM)en_US
dc.subjectGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)en_US
dc.subjectAdverse outcomesen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)en_US
dc.titleA systematic review to compare adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes and gestational diabetesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Malaza_Systematic_2022.pdf
Size:
811.62 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Malaza_SystematicSuppl_2022.xlsx
Size:
942.68 KB
Format:
Microsoft Excel XML
Description:
Supplementary Material

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: