Theorizing territorial withdrawal : the need to think strategically

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Pinfold, Rob Geist
Smith, M.L.R. (Michael)

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Routledge

Abstract

This article examines what factors cause states to withdraw from foreign territorial interventions. Scholarly analyses of withdrawal are rare, whilst within the broader research area of territorial conflict, studies are often dichotomized into neorealist or constructivist-inspired works, emphasizing a select few variables and one level of analysis alone. We argue these excessive simplifications of international politics lack utility for understanding territorial withdrawal. Instead, we employ the principles of strategic theory informed by a Clausewitzian paradigm, and construct a framework of three “arenas of bargaining,” spanning multiple variable-types and levels of analysis, to explain territorial withdrawal. In so doing, the analysis delineates a comprehensible and novel theoretical framework for understanding an under-researched policy problem.

Description

Keywords

Territorial withdrawal, Foreign territorial interventions, Withdrawal, Territorial conflict, International politics, Clausewitzian paradigm, Arenas of bargaining

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Rob Geist Pinfold & M. L. R. Smith (2022) Theorizing Territorial Withdrawal: The Need to Think Strategically, Studies in Conflict & Terrorism, 45:4, 285-310, DOI: 10.1080/1057610X.2019.1661083.