Hydropneumatic semi-active suspension system with continuously variable damping

Abstract

A well-known challenge in vehicle dynamics is to design a vehicle that will not only keep the occupants comfortable, but will also ensure safe and stable operation during various manoeuvres over multiple driving surfaces. A soft and compliant suspension is generally required for good ride comfort, while a stiff suspension with a low centre of mass is required for improved handling. These contradicting factors in the design process is commonly referred to as the ride comfort versus handling compromise.

A newly developed semi-active hydropneumatic suspension system is proposed to reduce or negate this compromise by being able to change its characteristics according to the dynamic state of the vehicle. The unit is equipped with two proportional solenoid valves that can provide continuously variable damping. In addition, the valves are able to completely close off flow to compressible gas volumes to provide four discrete stiffness characteristics.

This suspension system is based on a previously developed suspension that had only two state (open or closed) valves, which provided discrete damping characteristics. A thorough investigation of the older system proved that the system was capable of addressing the ride comfort versus handling compromise. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the updated design could deliver improved performance and to recommend focus areas for future research initiatives.

The suspension system’s characteristics were determined experimentally by actuating the unit on a test bench. Results indicated that the unit produced the desired stiffness, low damping and response time characteristics. A mathematical model of the suspension unit was developed and validated against experimental data. The model was used in single degree of freedom simulations to investigate both passive and semi-active controlled performance. Results indicated that the suspension could be semi-actively controlled for improve ride comfort. However, the magnitude of improvements with semi-active control, which includes a suitable response time, proved to be rather insignificant compared to the optimum passive suspension.