A crisis of design and judicial practice? Curbing state disengagement from the African court on human and peoples rights

dc.contributor.authorAdjolohoun, Horace Segnonna A.T.
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-10T12:23:31Z
dc.date.available2021-03-10T12:23:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-06
dc.description.abstractIn the space of four years, between 2016 and 2020, four of the ten states that had recognised the jurisdiction of the African Court on Human and Peoples’ Rights to receive cases directly from individuals and NGOs withdrew their declarations made under article 34(6) of the Court Protocol. While this form of contestation is not unprecedented in the history of states’ behaviour towards international courts, this article argues that the disengagement from the African Court’s jurisdiction involves peculiarities that specifically relate to the Court’s system design and its practice. The main contention in the article is that the declarationbased adherence to the African Court’s jurisdiction is in crisis due to a costbenefit imbalance. The article argues that although all four withdrawals resulted from decisions of the Court on important and contentious domestic socio-political issues, systemic features such as the lack of appeal, an overly restrictive review mechanism and the weak functioning of institutional shields contributed significantly to the withdrawal. The article also investigates administration of justice and judicial law making by the Court as factors that contributed to states’ distrust, before proposing options to curb the crisis and regain state adherence. Keywords: African Court; article 34(6) declaration; individual access; indirect access; withdrawal; legitimacy; discontent management; system design; judicial law making; systemic reforms.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentCentre for Human Rightsen_ZA
dc.description.librarianpm2021en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.ahrlj.up.ac.za/en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationSH Adjolohoun ‘A crisis of design and judicial practice? curbing state disengagement from the African court on human and peoples’ rights ’ (2020) 20 African Human Rights Law Journal 1-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1996-2096/2020/v20n1a1.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1609-073X (print)
dc.identifier.issn1996-2096 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.17159/1996-2096/2020/v20n1a1
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/78983
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherPretoria University Law Press (PULP)en_ZA
dc.rights© University of Pretoria. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.en_ZA
dc.subjectAfrican Courten_ZA
dc.subjectArticle 34(6) declarationen_ZA
dc.subjectIndividual accessen_ZA
dc.subjectIndirect accessen_ZA
dc.subjectWithdrawalen_ZA
dc.subjectLegitimacyen_ZA
dc.subjectDiscontent managementen_ZA
dc.subjectSystem designen_ZA
dc.subjectJudicial law makingen_ZA
dc.subjectSystemic reformsen_ZA
dc.titleA crisis of design and judicial practice? Curbing state disengagement from the African court on human and peoples rightsen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Adjolohoun_Crisis_2020.pdf
Size:
546.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: