Are macroeconomic factors adequate proxies for systematic influences in stock returns? A South African perspective

dc.contributor.authorSzczygielski, Jan Jakub
dc.contributor.authorBrummer, Leon Marx
dc.contributor.authorWolmarans, Hendrik Petrus
dc.contributor.authorZaremba, Adam
dc.contributor.emailhendrik.wolmarans@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-08T12:54:01Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractWe investigate whether macroeconomic factors adequately proxy for systematic influences in stock returns within the South African context. We also investigate whether a commonly used solution to factor omission in macroeconomic factor models, the residual market factor, adequately reflects systematic influences not reflected by a set of macroeconomic factors. Our contribution lies in precisely quantifying the ability of macroeconomic and residual market factors to proxy for systematic drivers of returns. Systematic influences are represented by statistically derived factor scores which are then related to a set of carefully selected macroeconomic factors. We find that the identification of macroeconomic factors that proxy for systematic influences is a challenge in itself. Once identified, macroeconomic factors are poor and unstable proxies for systematic influences and the use of a residual market factor does not significantly improve the approximation of factor scores. Our conclusion is that macroeconomic linear factor models are likely to be underspecified, even if a residual market factor is included. This has implications for researchers, investors, econometricians and economists that rely on macroeconomic factor models to study financial markets.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentFinancial Managementen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2021-03-04
dc.description.librarianhj2021en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Science Center of Polanden_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/loi/riaj20en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationJan J. Szczygielski, Leon M. Brümmer, Hendrik P. Wolmarans & Adam Zaremba (2020) Are macroeconomic factors adequate proxies for systematic influences in stock returns? A South African perspective, Investment Analysts Journal, 49:1, 34-52, DOI:v 10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1029-3523 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2077-0227 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/78319
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_ZA
dc.rights© 2020 Investment Analysts Society of South Africa. This is an electronic version of an article published in Investment Analysts Journal, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 34-52, 2020. doi : 10.1080/10293523.2020.1723854. Investment Analysts Journal is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/riaj20.en_ZA
dc.subjectMacroeconomic factorsen_ZA
dc.subjectFactor scoresen_ZA
dc.subjectLinear factor modelen_ZA
dc.subjectSystematic influencesen_ZA
dc.subjectResidual market factoren_ZA
dc.subjectUnderspecificationen_ZA
dc.titleAre macroeconomic factors adequate proxies for systematic influences in stock returns? A South African perspectiveen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Szczygielski_Are_2020.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: