Comparison of indirect fluorescent antibody test and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay in the detection of exposure of cattle to Theileria parva in Kenya

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Muraguri, G.R.
Gitau, P.K.
Mwangi, Michael N.
Mbogo, S.K.
Kariuki, D.P.

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Published by the Agricultural Research Council, Onderstepoort Veterinary Institute

Abstract

Appraisal of the indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT) and antigen enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) serological tests as carried out to detect cattle exposed to Theileria parva at the National Veterinary Research Centre, Muguga (NVRC), Kenya is reported. Using sera from T parva naive cattle and cattle experimentally exposed to T parva, the two tests were appraised in terms of their sensitivity and specificity.IFAT and ELISA had the same sensitivity of 90% while ELISA had a higher specificity (90 %) than IFAT (80 %). A comparison was also made of the capability of the two tests to detect exposure of dairy cattle to T parva prior to immunization against East Coast fever (ECF). The positive outcome from the IFAT was significantly higher (X2 = 30,36; P < 0,001) than that from the ELISA. The agreement between the two tests was low (Kappa= 0,21 ). The two tests indicated a higher risk of ECF in the study area than was expected. Indications are that the ELISA has been effectively adopted at NVRC.

Description

The articles have been scanned in colour with a HP Scanjet 5590; 600dpi. Adobe Acrobat v.9 was used to OCR the text and also for the merging and conversion to the final presentation PDF-format.

Keywords

Veterinary medicine, East Coast fever, ELISA, IFAT, Theileria parva

Sustainable Development Goals

Citation

Muraguri, GR, Gitau, PK, Mwangi, MN, Mbogo, SK & Kariuki, DP 1999, 'Comparison of indirect fluorescent antibody test and enzyme linked immunosorbent assay in the detection of exposure of cattle to Theileria parva in Kenya’. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 119-122.