Is the content and duration of the Graduated Return to Play protocol after concussion demanding enough? A challenge for Berlin 2016
Loading...
Date
Authors
Kemp, Simon
Patricios, Jonathan Speridon
Raftery, Martin
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Abstract
Determining the appropriate starting point and duration of the Return to Play (RTP) process after
injury is fundamental to the practice of clinical sports medicine. The most commonly cited RTP
framework after concussion is outlined as part of all international concussion consensus statements.
This framework is a key element of concussion management across all levels of sport and provides a
‘cornerstone’ of current education initiatives. In Rugby Union, RTP guidelines last underwent a major
update by World Rugby, the International Federation, in 2011 and are consistent with international
concussion consensus.
There is a limited evidence base informing the content and duration of the Graduated Return to
Play. Specifically, the evidence evaluating the effect, optimal amount and type of rest is sparse.
Moreover, current return to play guidelines for children and adolescents are based on those of
adults..
Whilst research concerning a range of clinical outcomes following concussive injury in sport
continues to develop, until recently, little has been known about the consequences of return to play.
Description
Keywords
Graduated Return to Play protocol (GRTP), Concussion demanding, Return to Play (RTP)
Sustainable Development Goals
Citation
Kemp, S, Patricios, J & Raftery, M 2016, 'Is the content and duration of the Graduated Return to Play protocol after concussion demanding enough? A challenge for Berlin 2016', British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 50, no. 11, pp. 644-645.