Towards a relational framework of design

dc.contributor.authorTladi, Bontle
dc.contributor.authorMokgohloa, Kgabo
dc.contributor.authorBignotti, Alex
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-02T07:15:03Z
dc.date.available2021-12-02T07:15:03Z
dc.date.issued2021-11
dc.descriptionPresented at the 32nd annual conference of the Southern African Institute for Industrial Engineering (SAIIE), held from 4-6 October 2021 in Muldersdrift, South Africa.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractThe evolution of design has seen shifts towards more co-creation-based practice. This is not an entirely new development, as there has been a growing recognition and adoption of user-centred themes and terms such as co-design and human-centred design, among others. The ways of ‘doing’ such practices are becoming well-documented and presented through various tools and techniques; however, what kind of ‘being’ supports this? The paper reviews indigenous research methodologies (IRM) to propose the dimensions of a more relational framework of design. It reviews the 4Rs of indigenous research methodologies to propose five areas (expanded into eight dimensions) for a more relational framework of design. These dimensions can also support a way of ‘being’ that can guide the approach towards more co-creative thought and practice when ‘doing’ design. These dimensions can further support efforts to understand and to develop approaches that respond to the decolonisation and indigenisation of the design process.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractDie evolusie van ontwerp toon skuiwe na meer sameskeppingspraktyke. Dit is nie opsigself ʼn nuwe ontwikkeling nie, omdat daar ʼn toenemende erkenning en aanneming van gebruikgesentreerde temas en terminologie soos ‘co-design’ en ‘human-centred design’ ontstaan het. Die benadering tot sulke praktyke word al hoe beter gedokumenteer en aangebied via verskillende platforms en tegnieke. Hierdie artikel bestudeer inheemse navorsingsmetodologieë om die dimensies van ʼn meer verhoudingsgerigte ontwerpsraamwerk voor te stel. Die vier R’e van inheemse navorsingsmetodologieë word gebruik om vyf areas (uitgebrei tot agt dimensies) van ʼn meer verhoudingsgerigte ontwerpsraamwerk voor te stel. Hierdie dimensie ondersteun ook ʼn benadering tot meer sameskeppende denkprosesse en praktyke wanneer daar ontwerp word. Hierdie dimensies dra by om die dekolonialisering en inheemsmaking van die ontwerpproses te verstaan en verder te ontwikkel.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentBusiness Managementen_ZA
dc.description.librarianhj2021en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://sajie.journals.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationTladi, B., Mokgohloa, K. & Bignotti, A. 2021, 'Towards a relational framework of design', South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 75-85.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1012-277X (print)
dc.identifier.issn2224-7890 (online)
dc.identifier.issn10.7166/32-3-2622
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/82938
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherSouthern African Institute for Industrial Engineeringen_ZA
dc.rights© 2021 Bontle Tladi, Kgabo Mokgohloa. SAJIE is an Open Access journal.en_ZA
dc.subjectEvolution of designen_ZA
dc.subjectEvolusie van ontwerpen_ZA
dc.subjectCo-creation-based practiceen_ZA
dc.subjectSameskeppingspraktykeen_ZA
dc.subjectCo-designen_ZA
dc.subjectHuman-centred designen_ZA
dc.subjectIndigenous research methodologies (IRM)en_ZA
dc.subjectInheemse navorsingsmetodologieëen_ZA
dc.subjectVerhoudingsgerigte ontwerpsraamwerken_ZA
dc.subjectRelational framework of designen_ZA
dc.subjectCo-creative designen_ZA
dc.subjectDesigner embodimenten_ZA
dc.subjectDecolonisationen_ZA
dc.subjectIndigenisationen_ZA
dc.titleTowards a relational framework of designen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Tladi_Towards_2021.pdf
Size:
518.37 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: