Why Namibia’s vote on Russia violates its foreign policy principles
| dc.contributor.author | Melber, Henning | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-08-23T06:34:29Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
| dc.description.abstract | When the United Nations General Assembly in an emergency session on 2 March took a vote on the war against Ukraine, Namibia abstained with 15 other African states. One (Eritrea) voted against and nine as ‘no shows’ did not vote at all. Twenty-eight African yes-votes (among these seven co-sponsors of the resolution) joined 113 other member states. | en_US |
| dc.description.department | Political Sciences | en_US |
| dc.description.embargo | 2023-10-29 | |
| dc.description.librarian | hj2022 | en_US |
| dc.description.uri | https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ctrt20 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Henning Melber (2022) Why Namibia’s vote on Russia violates its foreign policy principles, The Round Table, 111:2, 248-249, DOI: 10.1080/00358533.2022.2058281. | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0035-8533 (print) | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1474-029X (online) | |
| dc.identifier.other | 10.1080/00358533.2022.2058281 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/86923 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Routledge | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2022 The Round Table Ltd. This is an electronic version of an article published in The Round Table, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 248-249, 2022. doi : 10.1080/00358533.2022.2058281. The Round Table is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/ctrt20. [18 months embargo] | en_US |
| dc.subject | Namibia | en_US |
| dc.subject | Russia | en_US |
| dc.subject | Foreign policy | en_US |
| dc.subject | War against Ukraine | en_US |
| dc.subject | Voting | en_US |
| dc.title | Why Namibia’s vote on Russia violates its foreign policy principles | en_US |
| dc.type | Postprint Article | en_US |