Cultural and linguistic applicability of the English PEDS tools in a low-income community : a caregiver perspective

dc.contributor.authorBotes, Mignon
dc.contributor.authorSwanepoel, De Wet
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Marien Alet
dc.contributor.authorVan der Linde, Jeannie
dc.contributor.emailjeannie.vanderlinde@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-11T06:11:58Z
dc.date.available2024-07-11T06:11:58Z
dc.date.issued2023-09
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND : Regular developmental surveillance using structured developmental screening tools is a proven way to effectively identify developmental delays and disabilities. Most screening tools are developed and standardised in high-income countries and then adapted and translated for low-and middle-income countries. However, cultural differences and viewpoints make it challenging to translate and adapt developmental screening tools for low-income communities. OBJECTIVES : To determine caregivers’ perspectives on linguistic and cultural appropriateness of the Parents’ Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) and the PEDS: Developmental Milestones (DM) as a first step in the adaptation process for low-income communities in South Africa. METHOD : Participants (N=102) were selected using convenience sampling at an immunisation clinic. We employed a survey research design. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative survey feedback survey was analysed using data-driven inductive methodology. RESULTS : On the PEDS questionnaire, 38.2% of participants indicated the term ‘development’ on question 1 was not suitable; and 51% preferred the phrase ‘sometimes worry’ more than the phrase ‘have any concerns’ for questions 2 - 9. On the PEDS:DM, 58 of the 124 questions were deemed difficult. Most questions were problematic owing to cultural or linguistic differences (49 questions), while 9 questions were too difficult for the child’s age. The expressive language developmental domain had the most challenges. CONCLUSION : The present study relied on robust community participation, enabling community-led adaptation of the PEDS tools. Items on the tools were viewed solely from a community perspective, empowering the community to be ‘experts’ in this process, ensuring greater contextual relevance and applicability of the tools, as well as generalisability to similar low-income communities.en_US
dc.description.departmentScience, Mathematics and Technology Educationen_US
dc.description.departmentSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiologyen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2024en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-04:Quality Educationen_US
dc.description.urihttp://www.sajch.org.za/index.php/SAJCHen_US
dc.identifier.citationBotes, M., Swanepoel, D.W., Graham, M. & Van der Linde, J. 2023, 'Cultural and linguistic applicability of the English PEDS tools in a low-income community : a caregiver perspective', South African Journal of Child Health, vol. 17, no. 3, art. e2022, pp. 107-112, doi : 10.7196/SAJCH.2023.v17i3.2022.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1994-3032 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1999-7671 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.7196/SAJCH.2023.v17i3.2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/96921
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSouth African Medical Associationen_US
dc.rightsThis open-access article is distributed under Creative Commons licence CC-BY-NC 4.0.en_US
dc.subjectCaregiveren_US
dc.subjectParents' evaluation of developmental status (PEDS)en_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental milestonesen_US
dc.subjectLow-income communitiesen_US
dc.subjectSouth Africa (SA)en_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.subjectSDG-04: Quality educationen_US
dc.titleCultural and linguistic applicability of the English PEDS tools in a low-income community : a caregiver perspectiveen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Botes_Cultural_2023.pdf
Size:
207.18 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: