Inlet tube spacing and protrusion inlet effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes

dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Josua P.
dc.contributor.authorEverts, Marilize
dc.contributor.authorHall, Andrew T.C.
dc.contributor.authorMulock-Houwer, Franscois A.
dc.contributor.authorJoubert, Martin
dc.contributor.authorPallent, Leslie M.J.
dc.contributor.authorVause, Erin S.
dc.contributor.emailjosua.meyer@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2017-12-06T06:09:58Z
dc.date.issued2018-03
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to investigate inlet tube spacing and protrusion effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes. An experimental set-up was built for this investigation and three configurations of test sections were investigated. The first was a single-tube test section for validation purposes, of which the results were compared with literature. The second was two multi-tube test sections with three tubes spaced at different pitches. The third configuration was similar to configuration two, except that the centre tube had a small protrusion. All the tubes had an inner diameter of 3.97 mm, and long tube lengths of 6 m were used to ensure fully developed flow. The tubes were electrically heated that ensured a constant heat flux heating condition. Water was used as the test fluid, and the Prandtl number varied between 3 and 7. The experiments were conducted at heat fluxes of 2, 3 and 4 kW/m2 for Reynolds numbers between 1000 and 7000, to ensure that the transitional flow regime, as well as sufficient parts of the laminar and turbulent flow regimes, were covered. The tubes were spaced apart from each other at 1.25, 1.4 and 1.5 times the outer tube diameter, and the protrusion of the centre tube was 10% of the tube inner diameter. It was found that an increased pitch ratio dampened the inlet disturbances in the centre tube and reduced the flow asymmetry in the side tubes, therefore the differences in the critical Reynolds numbers and transition gradients of the three tubes decreased. As the inlet disturbances were damped in the centre tube, transitional was delayed compared to a single tube with a square-edged inlet. For the side tubes, the increased flow asymmetry led to increased critical Reynolds numbers, as well as increased transition gradients. The presence of a protrusion inlet in the centre tube significantly increased the asymmetry of the flow in the side tubes, which led to an additional increase in the critical Reynolds numbers and the transition gradients increased. Free convection effects also led to increased critical Reynolds numbers and transition gradients, as well as decreased differences between the results of the tubes in the multi-tube set-up when a square-edged inlet was used. However, free convection effects were not able to dampen the inlet disturbances caused by a protrusion inlet in the centre tube.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentMechanical and Aeronautical Engineeringen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2019-03-30
dc.description.librarianhj2017en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe NRF, Stellenbosch University/University of Pretoria Solar Hub, CSIR, EEDSM Hub, RDP and NAC.en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijhmten_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMeyer, J.P., Everts, M., Hall, A.T.C. et al. 2018, 'Inlet tube spacing and protrusion inlet effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimes', International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 118, pp. 257-274.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0017-9310 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1879-2189 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.125
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/63429
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, vol. 118, pp. 257-274, 2018. doi : 0.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.125.en_ZA
dc.subjectPitchen_ZA
dc.subjectShell and tubeen_ZA
dc.subjectHeat exchangersen_ZA
dc.subjectMultiple tubesen_ZA
dc.subjectHeat transfer coefficienten_ZA
dc.subjectFriction factoren_ZA
dc.subjectTube spacingen_ZA
dc.subjectProtrusionen_ZA
dc.subjectMaldistributionen_ZA
dc.subjectInlet effectsen_ZA
dc.subjectTransitionen_ZA
dc.subjectTubes (components)en_ZA
dc.subjectTurbulent flowen_ZA
dc.subjectReynolds numberen_ZA
dc.subjectPrandtl numberen_ZA
dc.subjectNatural convectionen_ZA
dc.subjectHeat transferen_ZA
dc.subjectHeat fluxen_ZA
dc.subjectHeat exchangersen_ZA
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-07
dc.subject.otherSDG-07: Affordable and clean energy
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-09
dc.subject.otherSDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-12
dc.subject.otherSDG-12: Responsible consumption and production
dc.subject.otherEngineering, built environment and information technology articles SDG-04
dc.subject.otherSDG-04: Quality education
dc.titleInlet tube spacing and protrusion inlet effects on multiple circular tubes in the laminar, transitional and turbulent flow regimesen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Meyer_Inlet_2018.pdf
Size:
1.65 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: