Wellbeing economy : an effective paradigm to mainstream post-growth policies?

dc.contributor.authorFioramonti, Lorenzo
dc.contributor.authorCoscieme, Luca
dc.contributor.authorCostanza, Robert
dc.contributor.authorKubiszewski, Ida
dc.contributor.authorTrebeck, Katherine
dc.contributor.authorWallis, Stewart
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, Debra
dc.contributor.authorMortensen, Lars F.
dc.contributor.authorPickett, Kate E.
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Richard
dc.contributor.authorRagnarsdottir, Kristin Vala
dc.contributor.authorMcGlade, Jacqueline
dc.contributor.authorLovins, Hunter
dc.contributor.authorDe Vogli, Roberto
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-06T09:47:49Z
dc.date.issued2022-02
dc.description.abstractThe concept of ‘wellbeing economy’ (WE), that is, an economy that pursues human and ecological wellbeing instead of material growth, is gaining support amongst policymakers, business, and civil society. Over the past couple of years, several national governments have adopted the WE as their guiding framework to design development policies and assess social and economic progress. While it shares a number of basic principles with various post-growth conceptualisations, the WE's language and concepts tend to be more adaptable to different social and economic contexts, thus penetrating into policy processes and connecting to a variety of cultural traits, not only in advanced economies but also in less industrialised nations. In this paper, we describe the key features of the WE, including its approach to key concepts like work, productivity and technology and several examples of its policy impact. We conclude by positing that the WE framework may be one of the most effective bases to mainstream post-growth policies at the national and global level.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentPolitical Sciencesen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2023-10-25
dc.description.librarianhj2021en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecoleconen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationFioramonti, L., Coscieme, L., Costanza, R. et al. 2022, 'Wellbeing economy : an effective paradigm to mainstream post-growth policies?', Ecological Economics, vol. 192, art. 107261, pp. 1-8.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0921-8009 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1873-6106 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107261
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/82961
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2021 Elsevier B.V. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Ecological Economics. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Ecological Economics,vol. 192, art. 107261, pp. 1-8, 2021, doi : 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107261.en_ZA
dc.subjectPost-growthen_ZA
dc.subjectDegrowthen_ZA
dc.subjectWellbeingen_ZA
dc.subjectSustainabilityen_ZA
dc.subjectSustainable development goals (SDGs)en_ZA
dc.titleWellbeing economy : an effective paradigm to mainstream post-growth policies?en_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Fioramonti_Wellbeing_2022.pdf
Size:
335.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: