Acceptance of open source geospatial software : assessing QGIS in South Africa with the UTAUT2 model

dc.contributor.authorHenrico, Susanna Jacoba
dc.contributor.authorCoetzee, Serena Martha
dc.contributor.authorCooper, Antony Kyle
dc.contributor.authorRautenbach, Victoria
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-13T07:05:04Z
dc.date.issued2021-02
dc.description.abstractGeospatial information and technologies are widely used in South Africa, initially mostly with proprietary software but today, mature, open source alternatives such as QGIS are available. We wanted to find out if and why South African users accepted QGIS, globally the most widely used free and open source GIS. We adapted the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model to test several hypotheses regarding the acceptance and use of QGIS in South Africa. 205 registered members of the Geo-Information Society of South Africa completed a structured questionnaire. Results show that habit has the most significant influence on behavioural intention to use QGIS, followed by facilitating conditions, price value and social influence. Performance expectancy, effort expectancy, hedonic motivation and access to source code played no significant role. The findings show that adoption of QGIS in South Africa is not primarily influenced by benefits attributed to open source software, such as cost benefits, customizability, improved reliability, quality and security. The results are useful for developers of any GIS product and for choosing a GIS product for an organization, because they provide insight into the behavioural intentions of users.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentGeography, Geoinformatics and Meteorologyen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2022-10-09
dc.description.librarianhj2021en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipThe South African National Defence Force (SANDF)en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tgisen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationHenrico S, Coetzee S, Cooper A, Rautenbach V. Acceptance of open source geospatial software: Assessing QGIS in South Africa with the UTAUT2 model. Transactions in GIS. 2021;25:468–490. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12697.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn1361-1682 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1467-9671 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1111/tgis.12697
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/83036
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherWileyen_ZA
dc.rights© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is the pre-peer reviewed version of the following article : 'Acceptance of open source geospatial software: Assessing QGIS in South Africa with the UTAUT2 model', Transactions in GIS, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 468-490, 2021, doi: 10.1111/tgis.12697. The definite version is available at : http://wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/tgis.en_ZA
dc.subjectOpen source geospatial softwareen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth Africa (SA)en_ZA
dc.subjectQGISen_ZA
dc.subjectGeographic information system (GIS)en_ZA
dc.titleAcceptance of open source geospatial software : assessing QGIS in South Africa with the UTAUT2 modelen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Henrico_Acceptance_2021.pdf
Size:
422.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: