Competing Values in the Integrated Environmental Management Process ~ Understanding the Dynamics Between Evidence Versus Value-Based Decision-Making

dc.contributor.advisorDavis, Nerhene
dc.contributor.emailjessdebeer@gmail.comen_ZA
dc.contributor.postgraduateDe Beer, Jessica
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-18T07:48:47Z
dc.date.available2018-06-18T07:48:47Z
dc.date.created2018-04-12
dc.date.issued2018
dc.descriptionMini Dissertation (MA) University of Pretoria, 2018.en_ZA
dc.description.abstractWithin the Integrated Environmental Management (IEM) process, Environmental Assessment Practitioners are expected to gather information or evidence in order to formulate decisions on the suitability of development projects as it relates to the environment which takes the form of an Environmental Impact Assessment. The EIA decision-making framework relies mainly on a technocratic-, rationalist or technical-rational approach, which is based largely on cognitive or scientific knowledge. This over-reliance on scientific evidence (evidence-based knowledge) limits the level to which non-scientific evidence (value-based knowledge) is incorporated into the EIA decision-making framework. There is a concern that an over-reliance on evidence-based decision-making will lead to valuable information being overlooked or ignored, resulting in a skewed and fragmented process which could fail in ensuring environmental justice for the citizens of South Africa. The overall methodological approach that was used to achieve the aim and objectives of this study was of a qualitative nature, relying on three main methods, including document analysis, expert interviews and focus group meetings. The literature review provided six thematic areas of interest which was further elaborated during the thematic analysis of the data. One of the key findings of this research was that although the South African legislative framework makes provision for value-based decision-making processes, the EIA decision-making framework in particular is too rigid to incorporate non-scientific knowledge or value-based evidence. The need to shorten the EIA decision-making timeframes to allow for social and economic development in addition other challenges facing the IEM field can also attributed to an over-reliance on a formulaic tick-box approach which limits the incorporation of value-based decision-making in the EIA decision-making process.en_ZA
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden_ZA
dc.description.degreeMAen_ZA
dc.description.departmentGeography, Geoinformatics and Meteorologyen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationDe Beer, J 2018, Competing Values in the Integrated Environmental Management Process ~ Understanding the Dynamics Between Evidence Versus Value-Based Decision-Making, MA Mini Dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd <http://hdl.handle.net/2263/65176>en_ZA
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/65176
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoria
dc.rights© 2018 University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.
dc.subjectIntegrated Environmental Managementen_ZA
dc.subjectEnvironmentalen_ZA
dc.subjectValuesen_ZA
dc.subjectDecision-makingen_ZA
dc.subjectSocial Impact Assessmenten_ZA
dc.subjectPublic Participationen_ZA
dc.subjectUCTD
dc.titleCompeting Values in the Integrated Environmental Management Process ~ Understanding the Dynamics Between Evidence Versus Value-Based Decision-Makingen_ZA
dc.typeMini Dissertationen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DeBeer_Competing_2018.pdf
Size:
4.79 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Mini Dissertation

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: