Normative versus actual methodologies in planning research : a hybrid picture
Loading...
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Sage
Abstract
What methodologies do we write about, and what type of research do we actually conduct and build upon in planning? Since the 1980s, planners have argued for more qualitative research within an interpretative paradigm. A content analysis of articles in Journal of Planning Education and Research do show a majority of qualitative studies, but cast within a pragmatic rather than an interpretative paradigm. More recently, planners have reiterated the need for qualitative research, especially participatory and applied forms of research within a critical social science paradigm. Some recommendations for planning education and research are discussed.
Description
Keywords
Citation impact, Research methodology, Planning research, Planning education
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG-04: Quality education
SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
SDG-11: Sustainable cities and communities
SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
SDG-17: Partnerships for the goals
SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
SDG-11: Sustainable cities and communities
SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
SDG-17: Partnerships for the goals
Citation
Du Toit, J., Boshoff, N. & Mariette, N. 2017, 'Normative versus actual methodologies in planning research : a hybrid picture', Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 477-487.
