Normative versus actual methodologies in planning research : a hybrid picture

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

Authors

Du Toit, Jacques Louis
Boshoff, Nelius

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Sage

Abstract

What methodologies do we write about, and what type of research do we actually conduct and build upon in planning? Since the 1980s, planners have argued for more qualitative research within an interpretative paradigm. A content analysis of articles in Journal of Planning Education and Research do show a majority of qualitative studies, but cast within a pragmatic rather than an interpretative paradigm. More recently, planners have reiterated the need for qualitative research, especially participatory and applied forms of research within a critical social science paradigm. Some recommendations for planning education and research are discussed.

Description

Keywords

Citation impact, Research methodology, Planning research, Planning education

Sustainable Development Goals

SDG-04: Quality education
SDG-09: Industry, innovation and infrastructure
SDG-11: Sustainable cities and communities
SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions
SDG-17: Partnerships for the goals

Citation

Du Toit, J., Boshoff, N. & Mariette, N. 2017, 'Normative versus actual methodologies in planning research : a hybrid picture', Journal of Planning Education and Research, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 477-487.