Screening for depression at the primary care level : evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa

dc.contributor.authorMashaba, Bahupileng L.
dc.contributor.authorMoodley, Saiendhra Vasudevan
dc.contributor.authorLedibane, Neo R.T.
dc.contributor.emailsaiendhra.moodley@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-06T05:59:37Z
dc.date.available2022-10-06T05:59:37Z
dc.date.issued2021-01
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND : Depression is a serious public health issue that has clinical, social and economic implications. Adult patients attending a primary healthcare (PHC) facility were screened in order to estimate the prevalence of depressive features and identify potential risk factors for screening positive. METHODS : This was an analytical cross-sectional study conducted at a clinic in Pretoria, South Africa. A self-administered questionnaire, which included the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) screening tool, was completed by patients attending the clinic. A PHQ-9 score of less than five was deemed as a negative screen for depressive features; with a score of five or more being considered a positive screen. A multivariate logistic regression model was developed to identify factors associated with a positive screen for depressive features. RESULTS : A total of 199 patients participated and the proportion screened positive for depressive features using the PHQ-9 tool was 46.23% (n = 92). Employed participants had significantly lower odds (odds ratio [OR] = 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25 – 0.94) of screening positive, whilst the participants with significantly higher odds were those with co-morbidities (OR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.08 – 4.17) and a history of stressful life events (OR = 3.21; 95% CI: 1.64 – 6.28). CONCLUSION : Depression appears to be a significant problem in PHC settings in South Africa. Screening for depressive features at primary level, targeting those with chronic medical conditions, history of recent stressful life events and other known risk factors may improve detection rates, lead to earlier diagnosis and improved health outcomes.en_US
dc.description.departmentSchool of Health Systems and Public Health (SHSPH)en_US
dc.description.urihttps://safpj.co.za/index.php/safpjen_US
dc.identifier.citationMashaba, B.L., Moodley, S.V. & Ledibane, N.R.T. Screening for depression at the primary care level: Evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africa. South African Family Practice 2021;63(1), a5217. https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v63i1.5217.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2078-6190 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2078-6204 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.4102/safp.v63i1.5217
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/87544
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAOSISen_US
dc.rights© 2021. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.en_US
dc.subjectDepressionen_US
dc.subjectScreeningen_US
dc.subjectMental healthen_US
dc.subjectPrimary careen_US
dc.subjectPrimary healthcare (PHC)en_US
dc.subjectPatient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)en_US
dc.titleScreening for depression at the primary care level : evidence for policy decision-making from a facility in Pretoria, South Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Mashaba_Screening_2021.pdf
Size:
644.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: