Validation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift : a South African ground application case study

dc.contributor.authorNsibande, Sifiso Albert
dc.contributor.authorDabrowski, James M.
dc.contributor.authorVan der Walt, Etienne
dc.contributor.authorVenter, Annette
dc.contributor.authorForbes, Patricia B.C.
dc.contributor.emailpatricia.forbes@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2017-02-14T11:02:47Z
dc.date.available2017-02-14T11:02:47Z
dc.date.issued2015-11
dc.description.abstractAir dispersion software models for evaluating pesticide spray drift during application have been developed that can potentially serve as a cheaper convenient alternative to field monitoring campaigns. Such models require validation against field monitoring data in order for them to be employed with confidence, especially when they are used to implement regulatory measures or to evaluate potential human exposure levels. In this case study, off‐target pesticide drift was monitored during ground application of a pesticide mixture to a sorghum field in South Africa. Atrazine was used as a drift tracer. High volume air sampling onto polyurethane foam (PUF) was conducted at six downwind locations and at four heights at each sampling point. Additional data, including meteorological information, required to simulate the spray drift with the AGDISP® air dispersion model was collected. The PUF plugs were extracted by a plunger method utilising a hexane:acetone mixture with analysis by GC‐NPD (94.5% recovery, 3.3% RSD, and LOD 8.7 pg). Atrazine concentrations ranged from 4.55 ng L‐1 adjacent to the field to 186 pg L‐1 at 400 m downwind. These results compared favourably with modeled output data, resulting in the validation of the model up to 400 m from the application site for the first time.Sensitivity studies showed the importance of droplet size distribution on spray drift, which highlighted the need for good nozzle maintenance. Results of this case study indicate that the model may provide meaningful input into environmental and human health risk assessment studies in South Africa and other developing countries.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentChemistryen_ZA
dc.description.librarianhb2017en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/chemosphereen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationNsibande, SA, Dabrowski, JM, Van der Walt, E, Venter, A & Forbes, PBC 2015, 'Validation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift : a South African ground application case study', Chemosphere, vol. 138, pp. 454-461.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0045-6535
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.092
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/59035
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Chemosphere. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Chemosphere, vol. 138, pp. 454-461, 2015. doi : 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2015.06.092.en_ZA
dc.subjectAtrazineen_ZA
dc.subjectSpray driften_ZA
dc.subjectAir dispersion modelingen_ZA
dc.subjectPesticidesen_ZA
dc.subjectPolyurethane foam (PUF)en_ZA
dc.subjectAGricultural DISPersal model (AGDISP)en_ZA
dc.titleValidation of the AGDISP model for predicting airborne atrazine spray drift : a South African ground application case studyen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Nsibande_Validation_2015.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: