A comparison of risk factor investigation and experts’ opinion elicitation analysis for identifying foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) high-risk areas within the FMD protection zone of South Africa (2007–2016)

dc.contributor.authorSirdar, Mohamed Mahmoud
dc.contributor.authorFosgate, Geoffrey Theodore
dc.contributor.authorBlignaut, Belinda
dc.contributor.authorHeath, Livio
dc.contributor.authorLazarus, David Dazhia
dc.contributor.authorMampane, R.L.
dc.contributor.authorRikhotso, O.B.
dc.contributor.authorDu Plessis, B.
dc.contributor.authorGummow, Bruce
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-31T06:04:17Z
dc.date.available2024-05-31T06:04:17Z
dc.date.issued2024-05
dc.description.abstractFoot-and-mouth disease is a controlled disease in accordance with the South African Animal Diseases Act (Act 35 of 1984). The country was classified by the World Organisation for Animal Health (WOAH) as having a FMD free zone without vaccination in 1996. However, this status was suspended in 2019 due to a FMD outbreak outside the controlled zones. FMD control in South Africa includes animal movement restrictions placed on cloven-hoofed species and products, prophylactic vaccination of cattle, clinical surveillance of susceptible species, and disease control fencing to separate livestock from wildlife reservoirs. The objectives of this study were to evaluate differences in identifying high-risk areas for FMD using risk factor and expert opinion elicitation analysis. Differences in risk between FMD introduction and FMD spread within the FMD protection zone with vaccination (PZV) of South Africa (2007–2016) were also investigated. The study was conducted in the communal farming area of the FMD PZV, which is adjacent to wildlife reserves and characterised by individual faming units. Eleven risk factors that were considered important for FMD occurrence and spread were used to build a weighted linear combination (WLC) score based on risk factor data and expert opinion elicitation. A multivariable conditional logistic regression model was also used to calculate predicted probabilities of a FMD outbreak for all dip-tanks within the study area. Smoothed Bayesian kriged maps were generated for 11 individual risk factors, overall WLC scores for FMD occurrence and spread and for predicted probabilities of a FMD outbreak based on the conditional logistic regression model. Descriptively, vaccine matching was believed to have a great influence on both FMD occurrence and spread. Expert opinion suggested that FMD occurrence was influenced predominantly by proximity to game reserves and cattle density. Cattle populations and vaccination practices were considered most important for FMD spread. Highly effective cattle inspections were observed within areas that previously reported FMD outbreaks, indicating the importance of cattle inspection (surveillance) as a necessary element of FMD outbreak detection. The multivariable conditional logistic regression analysis, which was consistent with expert opinion elicitation; identified three factors including cattle population density (OR 3.87, 95% CI 1.47–10.21) and proximities to game reserve fences (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73–0.92) and rivers (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01–1.07) as significant factors for reported FMD outbreaks. Regaining and maintaining an FMD-free status without vaccination requires frequent monitoring of high-risk areas and designing targeted surveillance.en_US
dc.description.departmentProduction Animal Studiesen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2024en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-15:Life on landen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe National Research Foundation of South Africa.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.elsevier.com/locate/prevetmeden_US
dc.identifier.citationSirdar, M.M., Fosgate, G.T., Blignaut, B. et al. 2024, 'A comparison of risk factor investigation and experts’ opinion elicitation analysis for identifying foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) high-risk areas within the FMD protection zone of South Africa (2007–2016)', Preventive Veterinary Medicine, vol. 226, art. 106192, pp. 1-14, doi : 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106192.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0167-5877 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1873-1716 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106192
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/96317
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license.en_US
dc.subjectFoot-and-mouth disease (FMD)en_US
dc.subjectBayesian krigingen_US
dc.subjectRisken_US
dc.subjectDip-tanken_US
dc.subjectHuman/domestic animals/wildlife interfaceen_US
dc.subjectKruger National Park (KNP)en_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.subjectSDG-15: Life on landen_US
dc.titleA comparison of risk factor investigation and experts’ opinion elicitation analysis for identifying foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) high-risk areas within the FMD protection zone of South Africa (2007–2016)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 5 of 6
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sirdar_Comparison_2024.pdf
Size:
4.04 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sirdar_ComparisonSupplFigs_2024.pdf
Size:
1.72 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Figures
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sirdar_ComparisonSuppl1_2024.pdf
Size:
122.66 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Questionnaire
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sirdar_ComparisonTabS1_2024.pdf
Size:
44.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Table S1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Sirdar_ComparisonTabS2_2024.pdf
Size:
68.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Table S2

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: