Does allelopathy explain the invasiveness of Campuloclinium macrocephalum (pompom weed) in the South African grassland biome?

dc.contributor.authorGoodall, Jeremy
dc.contributor.authorWitkowski, Ed T.F.
dc.contributor.authorAmmann, Sigrun
dc.contributor.authorReinhardt, Carl Frederick (Charlie)
dc.date.accessioned2010-05-31T06:52:08Z
dc.date.available2010-05-31T06:52:08Z
dc.date.issued2010-10
dc.description.abstractCampuloclinium macrocephalum is an Asteraceous alien weed that invades roadside vegetation and grassland in South Africa. The role of allelopathy and competition in its invasiveness was investigated using Eragrostis curvula (weeping lovegrass, an indigenous grass), E. tef and Lactuca sativa (lettuce) as test species. Trials were conducted in Petri-dishes, pots and in the field. Root and shoot extracts of adult C. macrocephalum plants did not inhibit seed germination in any test species. The greatest effect was radicle stunting produced by leaf extracts at 10 and 25% w/v. Eragrostis curvula was less tolerant of the extracts than E. tef. Allelopathic effects could however not be confirmed in pot trials evaluating the interference potential of the weed or weed residue effects against E. curvula. E. curvula growth and biomass was not affected by plant densities of one or five C. macrocephalum per pot, whereas C. macrocephalum suffered a 17% mortality and density-dependant trade-offs of size and biomass for survival. Under field conditions C. macrocephalum had a broader ecological niche than E. curvula, invading hygrophilous and undisturbed grasslands not amenable for E. curvula establishment, this included well drained disturbed soils on which the latter proliferated. Evidence of competitive exclusion of E. curvula by C. macrocephalum or vice versa was not detected. The coexistence of both species irrespective of relative density suggested these species have different resource requirements. Allelopathy was not an adequate causal mechanism to explain invasiveness in Campuloclinium macrocephalum. A more traditional hypothesis such as the absence of natural enemies, at this stage, better justifies the weed’s invasion success.en
dc.identifier.citationGoodall, J, Witkowski, ETF, Ammann, S & Reinhardt, C 2010, 'Does allelopathy explain the invasiveness of Campuloclinium macrocephalum (pompom weed) in the South African grassland biome?', Biological Invasions, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 3497-3512, DOI: 10.1007/s10530-010-9747-2 doi:10.1007/s10530-010-9747-2.en
dc.identifier.issn1387-3547
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s10530-010-9747-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/14161
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsSpringer. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comen_US
dc.subjectDensity dependenceen
dc.subjectIn vitro assaysen
dc.subjectPot trialsen
dc.subjectGrassland belt transectsen
dc.subject.lcshAllelopathy -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshBiotic communities -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshAlien plants -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshRoadside plants -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshGrassland plants -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshPlant competition -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshWeeping lovegrass -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshTeff -- South Africaen
dc.subject.lcshLettuce -- South Africaen
dc.titleDoes allelopathy explain the invasiveness of Campuloclinium macrocephalum (pompom weed) in the South African grassland biome?en
dc.typePostprint Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Goodall_Does(2010).pdf
Size:
670.09 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.43 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: