PEDS developmental screening tool construct validity for Northern Sotho and Zulu versions: a validation study

dc.contributor.authorMaleka, Boledi Karabo
dc.contributor.authorSwanepoel, De Wet
dc.contributor.authorGraham, Marien Alet
dc.contributor.authorVan der Linde, Jeannie
dc.contributor.emailjeannie.vanderlinde@up.ac.zaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-17T04:58:27Z
dc.date.available2024-10-17T04:58:27Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractValidation of the translated PEDS test is necessary to improve early detection of developmental delays. This study aimed to determine the construct validity of the translated Northern Sotho and Zulu PEDS tests. This validation study determined whether the translated PEDS tests are valid when compared to the reference English PEDS test. Stratified convenience sampling was used to recruit a collective of 546 research participants from a government healthcare facility in South Africa. A higher referral rate (43%) was found for Zulu participants when compared to Northern Sotho participants (17%). There were significant correlations of the Zulu and Northern Sotho PEDS tests when compared to the reference English PEDS test. Pearson correlations for the Zulu PEDS test ranged from 0.815 (very strong association) to 1.000 (perfect association) and for Northern Sotho from 0.496 to 0.854 (both, very strong association). Equivalence percentages for the Zulu PEDS ranged from 90.9% to 100.0% and for the Northern Sotho PEDS from 92.3% to 100.0%. The translated PEDS test has been found to have construct validity.en_US
dc.description.departmentScience, Mathematics and Technology Educationen_US
dc.description.departmentSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiologyen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2024en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-03:Good heatlh and well-beingen_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-04:Quality Educationen_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/journals/cijd20en_US
dc.identifier.citationBoledi Karabo Maleka, De Wet Swanepoel, Marien Alet Graham & Jeannie Van der Linde (2024): PEDS Developmental Screening Tool Construct Validity for Northern Sotho and Zulu Versions: A Validation Study, International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, DOI: 10.1080/1034912X.2024.2403390.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1034-912X (print)
dc.identifier.issn1465-346X (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/1034912X.2024.2403390
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/98628
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_US
dc.rights© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectConstruct validityen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental screeningen_US
dc.subjectDevelopmental milestonesen_US
dc.subjectPEDS testen_US
dc.subjectTranslationen_US
dc.subjectChildhood developmenten_US
dc.subjectNorthern Sotho versionen_US
dc.subjectZulu versionen_US
dc.subjectParents’ evaluation development status (PEDS)en_US
dc.subjectSDG-03: Good health and well-beingen_US
dc.subjectSDG-04: Quality educationen_US
dc.titlePEDS developmental screening tool construct validity for Northern Sotho and Zulu versions: a validation studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Maleka_PEDS_2024.pdf
Size:
309.01 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Online First Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: