Expressive law and the Americans with Disabilities Act
dc.contributor.author | Geisinger, Alex C. | |
dc.contributor.author | Stein, Michael Ashley | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-19T10:04:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-05-19T10:04:30Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.description.abstract | The question of why people follow the law has long been a subject of scholarly consideration. Prevailing accounts of how law changes behavior coalesce around two major themes: legitimacy and deterrence. Advocates of legitimacy argue that law is obeyed when it is created through a legitimate process and its substance comports with community mores. Others emphasize deterrence, particularly those who subscribe to law-and-economics theories. These scholars argue that law makes certain socially undesirable behaviors more costly, and thus individuals are less likely to undertake them. | en_ZA |
dc.description.department | Centre for Human Rights | en_ZA |
dc.description.librarian | am2017 | en_ZA |
dc.description.uri | http://michiganlawreview.org | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.citation | Alex C. Geisinger & Michael A. Stein, Expressive Law and the Americans with Disabilities Act, 114 Mich. L. Rev. 1061 (2016). | en_ZA |
dc.identifier.issn | 0026-2234 (print) | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1939-8557 (online) | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/60581 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
dc.publisher | Michigan Law Review | en_ZA |
dc.rights | This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Michigan Law Review at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Expressive law | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Americans with Disabilities Act | en_ZA |
dc.subject | Americans with Disabilities Act | en |
dc.subject.other | Law articles SDG-16 | en |
dc.subject.other | SDG-16: Peace, justice and strong institutions | en |
dc.title | Expressive law and the Americans with Disabilities Act | en_ZA |
dc.type | Article | en_ZA |