Cape vernacular interpretations

dc.contributor.author	Barker, Arthur Adrian Johnson
dc.contributor.email	arthur.barker@up.ac.za	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2013-07-02T13:32:02Z
dc.date.available	2013-07-02T13:32:02Z
dc.date.issued	2012-09
dc.description.abstract	The demise of the Modern Movement resulted in a plethora of architectural responses. Venturi argued for 'Complexity and Contradiction' (1966) in architecture, while contrastingly, Rudofsky (1964) and Oliver (1969), in their studies on the vernacular, motivated for a return to basics; to an architecture of authenticity. Ironically, this echoed the original intentions of the Modern Movement, underscored the early investigative travels of Le Corbusier and supported the aims of 'The other tradition of Modern Architecture' as espoused by Colin St. John Wilson (2007).	en_US
dc.description.librarian	hb2013	en_US
dc.description.uri	http://www.saia.org.za/publications.php?PHPSESSID=6c582817cb65fc91e03f6c13043e8aff	en_US
dc.identifier.citation	Barker, AAJ 2012, 'Cape vernacular interpretations', Architecture South Africa : Journal of the South African Institute of Architects, vol. 57, pp. 36-43.	en_US
dc.identifier.issn	1682-9387 (print)
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2263/21779
dc.language.iso	en	en_US
dc.publisher	The South African Institute of Architects	en_US
dc.rights	The South African Institute of Architects	en_US
dc.subject	Interpretations	en_US
dc.subject	Cape vernacular	en_US
dc.title	Cape vernacular interpretations	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US