Emission factors of domestic coal-burning braziers

dc.contributor.authorMakonese, Tafadzwa
dc.contributor.authorMasekameni, Daniel M.
dc.contributor.authorAnnegarn, Harold J.
dc.contributor.authorForbes, Patricia B.C.
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-06T13:10:03Z
dc.date.available2017-04-06T13:10:03Z
dc.date.issued2017-03
dc.description.abstractWe present experimental results of emission factors from a suite of domestic coal-burning braziers (lab fabricated and field collected) that span the possible range of real-world uses in the Highveld region of South Africa. The conventional bottom-lit updraft (BLUD) method and the top-lit updraft (TLUD) method were evaluated using coal particle sizes between 20 mm and 40 mm. Emission factors of CO2, CO and NOx were in the range of 98–102 g/MJ, 4.1–6.4 g/MJ and 75–195 mg/MJ, respectively. Particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) emissions were in the range 1.3–3.3 g/MJ for the BLUD method and 0.2–0.7 g/MJ for the TLUD method, for both field and lab-designed stoves. When employing the TLUD method, emission factors of PM2.5/PM10 reduced by up to 80% compared with those when using the BLUD method. Results showed the influence of ventilation rates on emission factors, which reduced by ~50% from low to high ventilation rates. For energy-specific emission rates, the combined (3-h) PM10 emission rates were in the range of 0.0028–0.0120 g/s, while the combined average CO emission rates were in the range of 0.20– 0.26 g/s, with CO2 emission rates in the range of 0.54–0.64 g/s. The reported emission factors from coal braziers provide the first comprehensive, systematic set of emission factors for this source category, and fill a major gap in previous efforts to conduct dispersion modelling of South African Highveld air quality. SIGNIFICANCE : • The study provides the first comprehensive, systematic set of emission factors from coal braziers. • The study fills a major gap in previous efforts to conduct dispersion modelling of South African Highveld air quality. • Results have implications for stove design and lay the groundwork for improvements in the design of existing coal braziers. • Results have implications for understanding the potential health impacts of condensed matter emissions from coal braziers.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentChemistryen_ZA
dc.description.librarianam2017en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Johannesburg; Global Alliance for Clean Cookstoves; South African National Energy Development Institute (SANEDI); GTZen_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.sajs.co.zaen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationMakonese T, Masekameni DM, Annegarn HJ, Forbes PBC. Emission factors of domestic coal-burning braziers. S Afr J Sci. 2017;113(3/4), Art. #2016-0187, 11 pages. http://dx.DOI.org/10.17159/sajs.2017/20160187.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0038-2353 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1996-7489 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.17159/sajs.2017/20160187
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/59689
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherAcademy of Science of South Africaen_ZA
dc.rights© 2017. The Author(s). Published under a Creative Commons Attribution Licence.en_ZA
dc.subjectEmission ratesen_ZA
dc.subjectDomestic coal combustionen_ZA
dc.subjectAir qualityen_ZA
dc.subjectVentilation ratesen_ZA
dc.subjectIgnition methoden_ZA
dc.titleEmission factors of domestic coal-burning braziersen_ZA
dc.typeArticleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Makonese_Emission_2017.pdf
Size:
440.3 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: