Reflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security
| dc.contributor.author | Van Marle, Karin | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-06T11:05:28Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2011-10-06T11:05:28Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
| dc.description.abstract | In this note I discuss the case of Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security (Du Toit). Also, although my main focus will fall on Du Toit, I refer to the recent defamation case of Robert McBride briefly. Both these cases disclose a few of the many complexities of the 'intersection' between an apartheid past and a future that is post-apartheid, particularly post-apartheid being or rather becoming. Beyond illuminating the wider questions of post-apartheid being, becoming and subjectivity, these cases also contribute to something more specific, namely the becoming of a post-apartheid jurisprudence. | en |
| dc.description.uri | http://www.pulp.up.ac.za/cat_2009_04.html | en_US |
| dc.identifier.citation | Van Marle, K 2010, 'Reflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security', Constitutional Court Review, vol. 3, pp. 347-367. | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2073-6215 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/17406 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | Pretoria University Law Press | en_US |
| dc.rights | © 2010 PULP (Pretoria University Law Press) All rights reserved. | en |
| dc.subject | Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Post-apartheid era -- South Africa | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Amnesty -- South Africa | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Jurisprudence -- South Africa | en |
| dc.subject.lcsh | Apartheid -- South Africa | en |
| dc.title | Reflections on post-apartheid being and becoming in the aftermath of amnesty : Du Toit v Minister of Safety and Security | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |