Law reform in South Africa : 21 years since the establishment of a supreme constitutional dispensation

dc.contributor.authorBotha, C.J. (Christo)
dc.contributor.authorBekink, Bernard
dc.contributor.emailcjbotha@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-08T10:04:35Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.description.abstractThe Republic of South Africa has a mixed legal system. It is a hybrid of Roman Dutch common law (influenced by English law), indigenous customary law, legislation at various hierarchical levels, and a supreme justiciable constitution. Since the system of apartheid (formally between 1948 and 1993) was not based on Roman Dutch law, it necessarily required legislative reform. The dawn of constitutional democracy in South Africa on 27 April 1994, again necessitated large-scale law reform in South Africa in order to dismantle the apartheid structure. This process entails both formal reform of the law (by constitutionally-mandated agencies) and institutional law reform (primarily by the South African Law Reform Commission). Although the various legislative authorities will bear the brunt of the reform of existing legislation, the judiciary also has a law-reform function. All courts and tribunals have an indirect law-reform function in that they must interpret all law legislation, and develop the common law and customary law. However, law reform in South Africa is not limited to changes and intervention by legislatures, subordinate lawmaking bodies and the judiciary. The South African Law Commission was specifically established to facilitate law reform in the Republic of South Africa. Apart from the competent lawmakers, the judiciary and the Law Reform Commission, other role players – such as the State Law Advisors, civil society and developments in international law – also play a role in the law reform and transformation required by the new constitutional dispensation. During the past 21 years these efforts proved to be effective and successful.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentPublic Lawen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2019-12-01
dc.description.librarianhj2019en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rtpl20en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationChristo Botha & Bernard Bekink (2018) Law reform in South Africa: 21 years since the establishment of a supreme constitutional dispensation, The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 6:2, 263-289, DOI: 10.1080/20508840.2018.1475904.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2050-8840 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2050-8859 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/20508840.2018.1475904
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/68617
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherRoutledgeen_ZA
dc.rights© 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an electronic version of an article published in Theory and Practice of Legislation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 263-289, 2018. doi : 10.1080/20508840.2018.1475904. Theory and Practice of Legislation is available online at : http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rtpl20.en_ZA
dc.subjectChapter Nine institutionsen_ZA
dc.subjectLegislative draftingen_ZA
dc.subjectJudicial lawmakingen_ZA
dc.subjectLegislative processen_ZA
dc.subjectCommon lawen_ZA
dc.subjectStatutory lawen_ZA
dc.subjectLaw reformen_ZA
dc.subjectSouth Africa (SA)en_ZA
dc.subjectMixed legal systemen_ZA
dc.subjectSupreme constitutionen_ZA
dc.subjectConstitutionalismen_ZA
dc.subjectLaw Reform Commissionen_ZA
dc.titleLaw reform in South Africa : 21 years since the establishment of a supreme constitutional dispensationen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Botha_Law_2018.pdf
Size:
423.82 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: