Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification : a choice experiment approach

dc.contributor.authorJourdain, Damien
dc.contributor.authorLairez, Juliette
dc.contributor.authorStriffler, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorAffholder, Francois
dc.contributor.emailu04959745@up.ac.zaen_ZA
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-31T08:28:02Z
dc.date.available2021-08-31T08:28:02Z
dc.date.issued2020-12
dc.descriptionSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 1: Annex A: Choice Experiment Section of the Surveyen_ZA
dc.descriptionSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 2: Annex B: The Mixed Logit Model (ML)en_ZA
dc.descriptionSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 3: Annex C: Mixed Logit or Latent Class Logiten_ZA
dc.descriptionSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 4: Annex D: Calculations of the marginal rate of substitution for continuous and effect-coded variablesen_ZA
dc.descriptionSUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL 5: Annex E: Preference clusters: descriptive statistics and distributionsen_ZA
dc.description.abstractSustainable intensification (SI) of farming systems aims to increase food production from existing farmland in ways that have a lower environmental impact and maintain the food production capacity over time. SI embraces a set of diverse agricultural technologies that share a common feature: their adoption is dependent on the interactions between farmers’ decision-making processes, locally specific agro-ecological conditions, and the traits of the technology itself. There are concerns about the sustainability of the maize mono-cropping systems that are in use in Laosc today. Therefore, we used discrete choice experiments (DCE) to explore the potential adoption or alternative agricultural systems. We analyse the heterogeneity of farmers’ preferences and willingness to pay for different cropping system attributes using a mixed logit model, and we discuss the possible drivers and barriers to the adoption of these more sustainable options. The results suggest the existence of four types of farmers: “fertility-minded”, “factor-constrained”, “maximisers”, and “risk-averse”. Each type of farmers was likely to react differently to the proposed sustainable intensification techniques. Overall, the DCE appeared to be an efficient tool to elicit the diversity of farmer preferences in an agricultural region and for fine-tuning strategies for successful research and development of sustainable intensification.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentAgricultural Economics, Extension and Rural Developmenten_ZA
dc.description.librarianhj2021en_ZA
dc.description.urihttps://www.springer.com/journal/41130en_ZA
dc.identifier.citationJourdain, D., Lairez, J., Striffler, B. et al. Farmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification: a choice experiment approach. Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies 101, 417–437 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41130-020-00100-4.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn2425-6870 (print)
dc.identifier.issn2425-6897 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1007/s41130-020-00100-4
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/81551
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherSpringeren_ZA
dc.rights© 2020, INRAE and Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature. The original publication is available at : https://www.springer.com/journal/41130.en_ZA
dc.subjectSustainable intensification (SI)en_ZA
dc.subjectAgro-ecological agricultureen_ZA
dc.subjectAdoption of innovationsen_ZA
dc.subjectMixed logiten_ZA
dc.subjectFarmer preferencesen_ZA
dc.subjectMaizeen_ZA
dc.titleFarmers’ preference for cropping systems and the development of sustainable intensification : a choice experiment approachen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 5 of 6
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jourdain_Farmers_2020.pdf
Size:
989.29 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jourdain_FarmersSuppl1_2020.pdf
Size:
202.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jourdain_FarmersSuppl2_2020.pdf
Size:
154.17 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jourdain_FarmersSuppl3_2020.pdf
Size:
116.16 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material 3
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Jourdain_FarmersSuppl4_2020.pdf
Size:
126.2 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material 4

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: