Protected-area boundaries as filters of plant invasions

dc.contributor.authorFoxcroft, Llewellyn C.
dc.contributor.authorJarosık, Vojtech
dc.contributor.authorPysek, Petr
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, D.M. (David Mark), 1958-
dc.contributor.authorRouget, Mathieu
dc.date.accessioned2011-08-08T08:50:35Z
dc.date.available2011-08-08T08:50:35Z
dc.date.issued2011-04
dc.description.abstractHuman land uses surrounding protected areas provide propagules for colonization of these areas by non-native species, and corridors between protected-area networks and drainage systems of rivers provide pathways for long-distance dispersal of non-native species. Nevertheless, the influence of protected-area boundaries on colonization of protected areas by invasive non-native species is unknown. We drew on a spatially explicit data set of more than 27,000 non-native plant presence records for South Africa's Kruger National Park to examine the role of boundaries in preventing colonization of protected areas by non-native species. The number of records of non-native invasive plants declined rapidly beyond 1500 m inside the park; thus, we believe that the park boundary limited the spread of non-native plants. The number of non-native invasive plants inside the park was a function of the amount of water runoff, density of major roads, and the presence of natural vegetation outside the park. Of the types of human-induced disturbance, only the density of major roads outside the protected area significantly increased the number of non-native plant records. Our findings suggest that the probability of incursion of invasive plants into protected areas can be quantified reliably.en
dc.description.sponsorshipSANParks, the Department of Science and Technology— National Research Foundation Centre of Excellence for Invasion Biology (C.I.B), and National Research Foundation Incentive Fund for support. P.P. and V.J. were supported by PRATIQUE (project KBBE-212459 of the 7th Framework Programme of the European Union), and grants AV0Z60050516 (AS CR), 0021620828, LC06073 (MSMT CR) and 206/09/0563 (GA CR). P.P. acknowledges support from a Praemium Academiae award from the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic. D.M.R. acknowledges support from C.I.B, National Research Foundation, and Hans Sigrist Foundation.en_US
dc.identifier.citationFoxcroft, LC, Jarosik, V, Pysek, P, Richardson, DM & Rouget, M 2011, 'Protected-area boundaries as filters of plant invasions', Conservation Biology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 400-405.en
dc.identifier.issn0888-8892 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1523-1739 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01617.x
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/17028
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWiley Blackwellen_US
dc.rightsWiley-Blackwell. The definite version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com. This article is embargoed by the publisher until April 2012.en_US
dc.subjectBarriers to invasionen
dc.subjectNon-native invasive speciesen
dc.subjectOverland water flowen
dc.subjectProtected-area boundaryen
dc.subject.lcshPlant invasions -- South Africa -- Kruger National Parken
dc.subject.lcshAlien plants -- South Africa -- Kruger National Parken
dc.subject.lcshProtected areas -- Managementen
dc.subject.lcshNational parks and reserves -- South Africaen
dc.titleProtected-area boundaries as filters of plant invasionsen
dc.typePostprint Articleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Foxcroft_Protected(2011).pdf
Size:
846.47 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: