Assessment of the global Copernicus, NASADEM, ASTER and AW3D digital elevation models in Central and Southern Africa

dc.contributor.authorOkolie, Chukwuma
dc.contributor.authorMills, Jon P.
dc.contributor.authorAdeleke, Adedayo
dc.contributor.authorSmit, Julian L.
dc.contributor.authorPeppa, Maria V.
dc.contributor.authorAltunel, Arif O.
dc.contributor.authorArungwa, Ikenna D.
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-21T08:07:43Z
dc.date.available2024-10-21T08:07:43Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.descriptionDATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT : The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.en_US
dc.description.abstractValidation studies of global Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) in the existing literature are limited by the diversity and spread of landscapes, terrain types considered and sparseness of groundtruth. Moreover, there are knowledge gaps on the accuracy variations in rugged and complex landscapes, and previous studies have often not relied on robust internal and external validation measures. Thus, there is still only partial understanding and limited perspective of the reliability and adequacy of global DEMs for several applications. In this study, we utilize a dense spread of LiDAR groundtruth to assess the vertical accuracies of four medium-resolution, readily available, free-access and global coverage 1 arc-second (30 m) DEMs: NASADEM, ASTER GDEM, Copernicus GLO-30, and ALOS World 3D (AW3D). The assessment is carried out at landscapes spread across Cape Town, Southern Africa (urban/industrial, agricultural, mountain, peninsula and grassland/shrubland) and forested national parks in Gabon, Central Africa (low-relief tropical rainforest and high-relief tropical rainforest). The statistical analysis is based on robust accuracy metrics that cater for normal and non-normal elevation error distribution, and error ranking. In Cape Town, Copernicus DEM generally had the least vertical error with an overall Mean Error (ME) of 0.82 m and Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 2.34 m while ASTER DEM had the poorest performance. However, ASTER GDEM and NASADEM performed better in the low-relief and high-relief tropical forests of Gabon. Generally, the DEM errors have a moderate to high positive correlation in forests, and a low to moderate positive correlation in mountains and urban areas. Copernicus DEM showed superior vertical accuracy in forests with less than 40% tree cover, while ASTER and NASADEM performed better in denser forests with tree cover greater than 70%. This study is a robust regional assessment of these global DEMs.en_US
dc.description.departmentGeography, Geoinformatics and Meteorologyen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2024en_US
dc.description.sdgSDG-15:Life on landen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Commonwealth Scholarship Commission and the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in the UK and the University of Cape Town Postgraduate Funding Office.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tgsi20en_US
dc.identifier.citationChukwuma J. Okolie, Jon P. Mills, Adedayo K. Adeleke, Julian L. Smit, Maria V. Peppa, Arif O. Altunel & Ikenna D. Arungwa (2024) Assessment of the global Copernicus, NASADEM, ASTER and AW3D digital elevation models in Central and Southern Africa, Geo-spatial Information Science, 27:4, 1362-1390, DOI: 10.1080/10095020.2023.2296010.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1009-5020 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1993-5153 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1080/10095020.2023.2296010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/98677
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTaylor and Francisen_US
dc.rights© 2024 Wuhan University. Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).en_US
dc.subjectDigital elevation model (DEM)en_US
dc.subjectGlobal digital elevation modelen_US
dc.subjectNASADEMen_US
dc.subjectALOS World 3Den_US
dc.subjectCopernicusen_US
dc.subjectLiDARen_US
dc.subjectNASA land vegetation and ice sensor (LVIS)en_US
dc.subjectHeight error mapen_US
dc.subjectNational Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)en_US
dc.subjectAdvanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER)en_US
dc.subjectShuttle radar topography mission (SRTM)en_US
dc.subjectSDG-15: Life on landen_US
dc.titleAssessment of the global Copernicus, NASADEM, ASTER and AW3D digital elevation models in Central and Southern Africaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Okolie_Assessment_2024.pdf
Size:
26.41 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Okolie_AssessmentSuppl_2024.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Supplementary Material

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: