Transducer influence on Auditory Steady State Evoked Potentials

dc.contributor.advisorSchmulian, Dunay Liezelen
dc.contributor.advisorSwanepoel, De Weten
dc.contributor.postgraduateMarais, Jacobus Johannesen
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-06T14:02:23Z
dc.date.available2005-01-12en
dc.date.available2013-09-06T14:02:23Z
dc.date.created2005-04-12en
dc.date.issued2006-01-12en
dc.date.submitted2005-01-12en
dc.descriptionDissertation (M (Communication Pathology))--University of Pretoria, 2006.en
dc.description.abstractPreliminary studies have stirred the hope that sound-field stimulation through auditory steady state evoked potentials can be used to assess aided thresholds in the difficult-to-test population. Before the introduction of ASSEP into the clinical field, as a technique for the prediction of aided thresholds in the difficult-to-test population, a question arises concerning its clinical validation. The application of ASSEP through sound field stimulation, in the determination of aided thresholds and for the evaluation of amplification fittings, is dependent on the determination of unaided responses. Subsequently the estimation of unaided thresholds in the hearing impaired population is dependent on the establishment of normative data from the normal hearing population. The aim of this study was to determine the influence of insert earphones and sound field speaker presentation on threshold estimations using monotic auditory steady state evoked potentials, in a group of normal hearing adults. To achieve the aim of the study, a comparative, within-group experimental design was selected. The results of the current study indicated that the monotic single ASSEP technique under both insert earphone- and sound field conditions provided a reasonable estimation (25-35 dB HL for inset earphones; 20-33 dB HL for sound field speaker presentation) of the behavioural pure tone thresholds. The minimum response levels obtained under insert earphone conditions differed significantly from those obtained under sound field conditions for all the frequencies tested except 2 kHz (p < 0.01). Subsequently, the current study indicates that minimum response levels obtained using a specific transducer should serve as the basis of comparison with behavioural thresholds obtained under the same transducer. Therefore, behavioural pure tone thresholds obtained under insert earphone conditions will not suffice as a basis of comparison for minimum response levels obtained for the ASSEP technique under sound field conditions, and vice versa. This research endeavour concluded that the monotic ASSEP technique under both insert earphone and sound field conditions provide useful information for the estimation of frequency specific thresholds, but that the results are transducer specific and that comparison across transducers should be avoided.en
dc.description.availabilityUnrestricteden
dc.description.departmentSpeech-Language Pathology and Audiologyen
dc.identifier.citationMarais, J 2005, Transducer influence on Auditory Steady State Evoked Potentials, M dissertation, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, viewed yymmdd < http://hdl.handle.net/2263/22935 >en
dc.identifier.upetdurlhttp://upetd.up.ac.za/thesis/available/etd-01122005-144151/en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/22935
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Pretoriaen_ZA
dc.rights© 2005, University of Pretoria. All rights reserved. The copyright in this work vests in the University of Pretoria. No part of this work may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the University of Pretoria.en
dc.subjectSound field speakersen
dc.subjectInsert earphonesen
dc.subjectSound fielden
dc.subjectEstimated pure tone thresholdsen
dc.subjectAuditory steady state evoked potentialen
dc.subjectStimulus presentationsen
dc.subjectTransducersen
dc.subjectObjective audiometryen
dc.subjectMinimum response levelsen
dc.subjectUCTDen_US
dc.titleTransducer influence on Auditory Steady State Evoked Potentialsen
dc.typeDissertationen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
00dissertation.pdf
Size:
1.25 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format