UPSpace will be temporarily unavailable tonight from 19:00 to 23:00 (South African Time) due to scheduled maintenance. We apologise for any inconvenience this may cause and appreciate your understanding
 

Is die ortodoksie se verstaan van die sondeval belemmerend vir die gesprek tussen teologie en natuurwetenskap?

dc.contributor.authorBuitendag, Johan
dc.contributor.emailjohan.buitendag@up.ac.zaen
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-15T07:09:45Z
dc.date.available2013-07-15T07:09:45Z
dc.date.issued2012-11-05
dc.description.abstractIn hierdie artikel is betoog dat die Gereformeerde Ortodoksie se begrip van die sondeval ’n belemmering was vir die gesprek tussen teologie en natuurwetenskap. Die rede hiervoor was dat dit ten eerste ’n bepaalde verstaan van liniêre tyd nahou en ten tweede dat dit ’n bonatuurlike ingryp veronderstel het. Albei hierdie aspekte het die debat onnodig problematiseer. Die argument is ontwikkel deur eerstens die probleem te definieer, gevolg deur ’n uiteensetting van die standpunte van Augustinus en Calvyn onderskeidelik oor die sondeval. As ’n heuristiese sleutel is die konsepte van infralapsarisme en supralapsarisme aangewend om die tema te ontleed. Die artikel is afgesluit met die oortuiging dat die imago Dei ’n beliggaamde menslike persoon is wat biologies in die geskiedenis in terme van selfbewussyn en morele verantwoordelikheid ontluik het.en
dc.description.abstractIn this article it was argued that the Reformed Orthodoxy’s interpretation of the Fall had become an impediment in the dialogue between theology and science. The reason was that it assumed firstly a specific understanding of linear time and secondly a metaphysical intervention. Both events were unnecessarily problematising the debate. The argument was deployed by stating the problem, followed by an exposition of the views of Augustine and Calvin on the Fall. As a heuristic key, the concepts of infralapsarism and supralapsarism were applied respectively to analyse the topic. The article concluded with the conviction that the imago Dei is an embodied human person that had biologically emerged in history as a center of self-awareness, and moral responsibility.en
dc.description.librarianam2013en
dc.description.librarianmn2013
dc.description.urihttp://www.indieskriflig.org.zaen
dc.identifier.citationBuitendag, J., 2012, ‘Is die ortodoksie se verstaan van die sondeval belemmerend vir die gesprek tussen teologie en natuurwetenskap?’In die Skriflig/In Luce Verbi 46(1), Art. #41, 10 pages. http://dx.DOI.org/10.4102/ids.v46i1.41en
dc.identifier.issn1018-6441
dc.identifier.other10.4102/ids.v46i1.41
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/21939
dc.language.isoAfrikaansen
dc.publisherAOSIS Open Journalsen
dc.rights© 2012. The Authors. Licensee: AOSIS OpenJournals. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License.en
dc.subjectGereformeerde Ortodoksieen
dc.subjectReformed Orthodoxyen
dc.subjectSondevalen
dc.subjectFallen
dc.subjectTeologieen
dc.subjectTheologyen
dc.subjectNatuurwetenskapen
dc.subjectScienceen
dc.titleIs die ortodoksie se verstaan van die sondeval belemmerend vir die gesprek tussen teologie en natuurwetenskap?en
dc.title.alternativeIs the Orthodoxy’s notion of the fall inhibitory for the dialogue between theology and science?en
dc.typeArticleen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Buitendag_Is(2012).pdf
Size:
476.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: