Administrative law
| dc.contributor.author | Brand, J.F.D. (Jacobus Frederick Daniel, 1968- ) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Murcott, Melanie | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-13T08:44:54Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-08-13T08:44:54Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Administrative law-related cases in 2013 produced developments relating to two general issues: the relationship between the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (‘PAJA’) and legality; and the relationship between the PAJA and labour law. In addition, a number of more specific issues were addressed, most notably whether our law recognises a doctrine of substantive legitimate expectation, and issues relating to remedies on administrative law review. | en_ZA |
| dc.description.librarian | am2015 | en_ZA |
| dc.description.uri | http://reference.sabinet.co.za/sa_epublication/ju_assal | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.citation | Brand, D & Murcott, M 2013, 'Adminstrative law', Annual Survey of South African Law, pp. 61-90. | en_ZA |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0376-4605 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/2263/49296 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_ZA |
| dc.publisher | Juta Law | en_ZA |
| dc.rights | Juta Law | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (‘PAJA’) | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Legality | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Labour law | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Courts | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Administrative law-related cases | en_ZA |
| dc.subject | Promotion of Administrative Justice Act 3 of 2000 (PAJA) | en_ZA |
| dc.title | Administrative law | en_ZA |
| dc.type | Article | en_ZA |