Model predictive control strategy of energy-water management in urban households

dc.contributor.authorWanjiru, Evan M.
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Lijun
dc.contributor.authorXia, Xiaohua
dc.date.accessioned2016-10-20T12:08:39Z
dc.date.issued2016-10
dc.description.abstractThe management of energy-water nexus in buildings is increasingly gaining attention among domestic end-users. In developing countries, potable water supply is unreliable due to increasing demand, forcing end-users to seek alternative strategies such as pumping and storage in rooftop tanks to reliably meet their water demand. However, this is at an increased cost of energy cost. In this paper, the open loop optimal control model and the closed-loop model predictive control (MPC) model, both with disturbances, are compared while minimizing the maintenance cost of the pump. The open loop optimal model is suitable in instances where only random disturbances due to measurement errors are present. However, in case the demand pattern changes for reasons such as occupancy change in the house, the closed-loop MPC model is suitable as it robustly minimizes the pumping cost while meeting the customer demand. Further, MPC proves its robustness as it is able to overcome the turnpike phenomenon. Each of these two models has their own strengths. The open loop model is cost effective and easy to implement for customers that have a steady demand pattern while the closed-loop MPC model is more robust against demand pattern changes and external disturbances. It is recommended that these two models are adopted according to the specific application.en_ZA
dc.description.departmentElectrical, Electronic and Computer Engineeringen_ZA
dc.description.embargo2017-10-31
dc.description.librarianhb2016en_ZA
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Hub for Energy E ciency and Demand Side Management (EEDSM).en_ZA
dc.description.urihttp://www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergyen_ZA
dc.identifier.citationWanjiru, EM, Zhang, LJ & Xia, XH 2016, 'Model predictive control strategy of energy-water management in urban households', Applied Energy, vol. 179, pp. 821-831.en_ZA
dc.identifier.issn0306-2619 (print)
dc.identifier.issn1872-9118 (online)
dc.identifier.other10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.050
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/57390
dc.language.isoenen_ZA
dc.publisherElsevieren_ZA
dc.rights© 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Notice : this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Applied Energy. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. A definitive version was subsequently published in Applied Energy, vol. 179, pp. 821-831, 2016. doi : 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.050.en_ZA
dc.subjectDemand managementen_ZA
dc.subjectEnergy-water nexusen_ZA
dc.subjectOptimal controlen_ZA
dc.subjectTime-of-use (TOU)en_ZA
dc.subjectModel predictive control (MPC)en_ZA
dc.titleModel predictive control strategy of energy-water management in urban householdsen_ZA
dc.typePostprint Articleen_ZA

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wanjiru_Model_2016.pdf
Size:
474.54 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Postprint Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.75 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: