Performance analysis of Bayesian optimised gradient-boosted decision trees for digital elevation model (DEM) error correction : interim results

dc.contributor.authorOkolie, Chukwuma
dc.contributor.authorAdeleke, Adedayo
dc.contributor.authorSmit, Julian
dc.contributor.authorMills, Jon
dc.contributor.authorOgbeta, Caleb
dc.contributor.authorMaduako, Iyke
dc.contributor.emailadedayo.adeleke@up.ac.za
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-11T08:16:05Z
dc.date.available2024-09-11T08:16:05Z
dc.date.issued2024-06
dc.descriptionPaper presented at ISPRS TC II Mid-term Symposium “The Role of Photogrammetry for a Sustainable World”, 11–14 June 2024, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA.en_US
dc.descriptionLIDAR data for the City of Cape Town was provided by the Information and Knowledge Management Department, City of Cape Town.en_US
dc.description.abstractGradient-Boosted Decision Trees (GBDTs), particularly when tuned with Bayesian optimisation, are powerful machine learning techniques known for their effectiveness in handling complex, non-linear data. However, the performance of these models can be significantly influenced by the characteristics of the terrain being analysed. In this study, we assess the performance of three Bayesian-optimised GBDTs (XGBoost, LightGBM and CatBoost) using digital elevation model (DEM) error correction as a case study. The performance of the models is investigated across five landscapes in Cape Town South Africa: urban/industrial, agricultural, mountain, peninsula and grassland/shrubland. The models were trained using a selection of datasets (elevation, terrain parameters and land cover). The comparison entailed an analysis of the model execution times, regression error metrics, and level of improvement in the corrected DEMs. Generally, the optimised models performed considerably well and demonstrated excellent predictive capability. CatBoost emerged with the best results in the level of improvement recorded in the corrected DEMs, while LightGBM was the fastest of all models in the execution time for Bayesian optimisation and model training. These findings offer valuable insights for applying machine learning and hyperparameter tuning in remote sensing.en_US
dc.description.departmentGeography, Geoinformatics and Meteorologyen_US
dc.description.librarianhj2024en_US
dc.description.sdgNoneen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Commonwealth Scholarship Commission UK, and the University of Cape Town Postgraduate Funding Office.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/isprs-journal-of-photogrammetry-and-remote-sensingen_US
dc.identifier.citationOkolie, C., Adeleke, A., Smit, J. et al. 2024, 'Performance analysis of Bayesian optimised gradient-boosted decision trees for digital elevation model (DEM) error correction: interim results', ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 179-183, doi : 10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-179-2024.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1872-8235 (online)
dc.identifier.issn0924-2716 (print)
dc.identifier.other10.5194/isprs-annals-X-2-2024-179-2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2263/98121
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCopernicus Publicationsen_US
dc.rights© Author(s) 2024. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.en_US
dc.subjectDigital elevation model (DEM)en_US
dc.subjectCopernicusen_US
dc.subjectBayesian optimisationen_US
dc.subjectGradient boosted decision trees (GBDTs)en_US
dc.subjectMachine learningen_US
dc.subjectHyperparameter tuningen_US
dc.titlePerformance analysis of Bayesian optimised gradient-boosted decision trees for digital elevation model (DEM) error correction : interim resultsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Okolie_Performance_2024.pdf
Size:
1.1 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: